Answer:
I would say A. not 100% sure but seems the most logical.
A consequentialist approach to ethics is an approach that claims that the morality of an action depends on its outcome. This means that an action is "good" is the consequence it brings is good as well. An example of such a theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism states that an action is morally good if it leads to the most happiness for greatest number of people. However, an objection that can be made to this theory is that utility and happiness are subjective, as well as difficult to measure.
On the other hand, non-consequentialist ethics state that the morality of an action is based on the rightness and wrongness of the actions themselves and not the consequences of those actions. An example of this is the Natural Rights Theory, which states that humans have an inherent right to certain rights, regardless of human behaviour. However, it is unclear who has the right to state what these rights are, which has led to criticism of the theory.
Answer:
it tells you that liberty should stay but be defended liberty is peace and defending is fighting.
Explanation:
The federalist papers were a collection of essays that promoted the ratification of the US Constitution in the 1700s. They were written by <span>Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison, all Federalists.
Hope this helps :)</span>
