I think it’s B, because the point of the event was decide how America was going to be governed.Although the Convention had been officially called to revise the existing Articles of Confederation.
Lincoln said a house divided can not function the house being america and being divided by civil war<span />
There are a couple of differences:
1) The Americas (especially Latin America), will not have Roman Catholic influences in the area, and will not have it as their state religion.
2) The land will keep most of it's natural wealth, though it may not be used in great quantities as before.
3) Population will not take a hit, and will continue to grow, as European diseases are not spread to them. However, if trading occurs between the north-eastern tribes all the way down to Central America, they will still be exposed to diseases carried by the French and British.
4) They may not be exposed to the usage of firearms as quickly, which may lead to their demise to their native enemies. Firearms, while they took very long to reload back then, was a symbol of power and was used more as a shock then as a weapon (until the mini-ball, repeater, and other upgrades to the rifle came).
5) The other way to look at it is that another European Power may take over those lands. The first of which is Portugal, whose lands were very near the Spanish territory. The next in line would be France, which borders the Spanish territories, and than Britain.
~
Answer : As the US expanded after the Revolutionary War, the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 helped organize the new territories and set up the steps each territory needed to take in order to become a state. It is interesting to note that the Northwest Ordinance outlawed slavery in the Northwest Territory.
Explanation: HOPE THIS HELPS
