Answer:
Prior restraint
Explanation:
It is not in the habit of the United States to practice prior restraint as a type of press censorship, that prevents any form of materials from being published. The United States does not use any legal effort in a bid to try and stop a speech prior to its occurrence in effect. In other words, prior restraint is not a known practice in the United States as a form of censorship.
Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
