Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

12

Charlene sold 15 magazines subscriptions for the fundraiser. Mark sold 17 subscriptions and Paul sold 12. How many magazine subs

criptions did they sell in all?
Let s represent subscriptions

Equation:______

They sold_____ subscriptions in all.

1 answer:

Dahasolnce [82]3 years ago

5 0

15+17+12= 44
The sold 44 magazine subscriptions in total.

You might be interested in

Jana is training for a triathlon. If Jana biked at a constant rate, how many miles did she bike in the first 15 minutes?

Harman [31]

In order to answer, I would first need to know Jana's speed, not that she biked at a constant rate.

7 0

3 years ago

You spend 60 on clothes and buy 3 dvd movies. your friend spends nothing on clothes and buys 8 dvd movies. you both spend the sa

garik1379 [7]

Each dvd cost $7.50 how? Your friends buy 8 dvd's and in total is 60, you want to divide 60 from 8 and find that it's 7.50 and then multiply 8 to 7.50 and it should be 60. Hope this helps!!

5 0

3 years ago

The 4 in 400,000 has a value of 400 yes or no

Oduvanchick [21]

I'm pretty sure its not.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Mrs.smith paid $125 to have her hair colered and cut.if she tips her hairdresser 15% of her bill how much was the tip

rewona [7]

125 divided by 100 is 1.25, 1.25 times 15 is 18.75.She tips $18.75

5 0

3 years ago

Toxaphene is an insecticide that has been identified as a pollutant in the Great Lakes ecosystem. To investigate the effect of t

Likurg_2 [28]

Answer:

This data suggest that there is more variability in low-dose weight gains than in control weight gains.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let $\sigma_{1}^{2}$ be the variance for the population of weight gains for rats given a low dose, and $\sigma_{2}^{2}$ the variance for the population of weight gains for control rats whose diet did not include the insecticide.

We want to test $H_{0}: \sigma_{1}^{2} = \sigma_{2}^{2}$ vs $H_{1}: \sigma_{1}^{2} > \sigma_{2}^{2}$ . We have that the sample standard deviation for $n_{2} = 22$ female control rats was $s_{2} = 28$ g and for $n_{1} = 18$ female low-dose rats was $s_{1} = 51$ g. So, we have observed the value

$F = \frac{s_{1}^{2}}{s_{2}^{2}} = \frac{(51)^{2}}{(28)^{2}} = 3.3176$ which comes from a F distribution with $n_{1} - 1 = 18 - 1 = 17$ degrees of freedom (numerator) and $n_{2} - 1 = 22 - 1 = 21$ degrees of freedom (denominator).

As we want carry out a test of hypothesis at the significance level of 0.05, we should find the 95th quantile of the F distribution with 17 and 21 degrees of freedom, this value is 2.1389. The rejection region is given by {F > 2.1389}, because the observed value is 3.3176 > 2.1389, we reject the null hypothesis. So, this data suggest that there is more variability in low-dose weight gains than in control weight gains.

8 0

3 years ago