<span>How freedom was ripped from the world through Americans actions but knew America is assigned to brag freedom back forth to mankind. America should except it to push away the British.</span>
-America is still a country where a person with great idea or skills can become very successful. It's easier than in any other place to start a new venture and find capital to expand your enterprise. What counts is your idea, not your background.
-Americans are still proud of their country (in Forbes patriotism ranking USA ranked at the first place).
-American constitution didn't change that much over time and it still held in highest regard by US citizens.
-Civil liberties like freedom of speech and private property are being safeguarded,
-America is open to immigrants.
-America remains a very religious nation.
-Americans still are very liberal when it comes to market and conservative in beliefs.
-Americans don't count on government to take care of their problems, but instead take initiative, inheritance from the times, when country was still being formed.
It's worth mentioning thatsome of above "feats" are less explicit nowdays, than they were in the past.
Hope it helped :)
Answer:
The Supreme Court decision that decided the 2000 Presidential Election should go down in history as one of the court's most ill-conceived judgments. In issuing its poorly-reasoned ruling in Bush v. Gore, the court majority unnecessarily exposed itself to charges of partisanship and risked undermining the court's stature as an independent, impartial arbiter of the law. Although the court majority correctly identified constitutional problems in the specific recount proceedings ordered by the Florida Supreme Court, the decision to end all recount attempts did immeasurable damage to the equal protection rights the court claimed to be guarding, since it favored a convenient and timely tabulation of ballots over an accurate recording of the vote. In the controversy that followed this decision, some critics of the majority decision argued that the court had no business taking on Bush v. Gore in the first place, that it should have remained solely within the Florida courts (Ginsburg, J. [Dissent] Bush v. Gore [2000]). This paper will argue that the court was correct to intervene but that umm the resulting decision was flawed and inconsistent, with potentially serious, adverse implications for the Federal judiciary if the court continues to issue rulings in this way.
Explanation:
Answer:
I believe it would be true.
Explanation:
We have driven animals out of their regular habitats by using the land, thus creating more interactions with each other.
Answer:
it's really good afternoon sir remu to the best part of my life is a great way imo I love the idea I love you so very nice of my friends and I will be in touch with my module for the next time you have been
