The statement which best articulates a non interventionist argument against American imperialism is ''American expansion exploits the people’s of other nations''
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
The American rule over the other countries through ways like trade, religion or may be with the use of military forces was not liked by the people of those countries because it led to the deterioration of those economies and the exploitation of people of those countries.
Therefore people of those countries did not like it because it led to the exploitation of their resources, economy, financially and there was too much interference in the working of the government of those countries also.
The Constitutional Convention argued about slavery for a great amount of time, but eventually they really didn't put anymore effort into the topic of slavery. However, f<span>or every five enslaved people they counted three of them it was called a three-fifth. </span>
Answer:
He created new trade routes. He created canals to trade on the rivers. He required conquered people to pay tribute.
Explanation:
<span>Rivers linked the Byzantines to the Russians. Trade occurred between the two cultures, so the Russians got supplies and ideas they would not have otherwise gotten.Trade brought Kiev into the Byzantine's influence. Also, the Byzantines had a strong hand in the Eastern Orthodox church, which converted Slavs via missionaries.</span>