There are indirect ways of affecting state laws by with holding funding's. and that's why we have a 55mph speed on the high way with a design of 70mph speed.
The conclusion that can be drawn is that Nativists opposed i migration from Asian nations. This can be seen from the stereotypical Asian features of the person being punched, and how a similar person is in a place named “China Town”.
Here are why the other reasons are incorrect:
American citizens never were targets of discrimination during this time, unless you count immigrants who became citizens (but not white American nationals), but this is not the answer and the cartoon does not illustrate Americans being discriminated against.
Though Americans opposed immigration from some European nations, the political cartoon is targeting Asian immigrants.
Finally, nativists did not focus on native Americans (mainly immigrants) and this cartoon did not target Native Americans. However, it’s likely that nativists at the time disliked native Americans. (But the cartoon isn’t about that).
Hope this helps!
The concepts both city charter and home rule are both related to the constitution and the government.
<u>Explanation:</u>
A city charter resembles a constitution. It depicts the sort of regional government, its structure, and its forces. A few states give home standard to their urban communities. Under home guideline, urban communities have the ability to compose their own sanctions.
Home rule is legislature of a province, subordinate nation, or area by its own residents. It is in this manner the intensity of a constituent piece of a state to exercise such of the state's forces of administration inside its own managerial territory that have been decentralized to it by the focal government.
