He states that the word conservation has three principles to it. One being that conservation stands for development; that these resources on Earth are here for the benefit of society today. He believes that we should be developing these resources and using them to the fullest extent for this generation. We should be recognizing that the present generation has the right to these resources to meet our demand, and then the remaining is for the next future generation.
The second principle of conservation that this article states is the prevention of waste and that our duty as humans is to have control of the Earth that we live on. We should be controlling the waste of these resources, like the waste of timber in a forest fire for example.
The third principle of conservation is that these developed and preserved resources should benefit many people and not just a few. They should be considered a common good.
It will either be B or C, goodluck!!
Answer:
No, the government should not require restaurants to only sell healthy meals. While it may help the health of some people, it will hinder some happiness- after all, you don't purchase a double chocolate chip cookie for your health. Sometimes you need a treat or reward for your work, and outlawing sweets and unhealthy food would make that impossible. However, making a law to <em>reduce</em> the amount of unhealthy food or making it so that healthy options are more readily available is an option. Japan and South Korea are excellent examples of this, as their vending machines tend to sell predominantly healthy food, but unhealthy food is also an option.
There was no structure?
Desultory means lacking a plan or enthusiasm
