1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pav-90 [236]
3 years ago
11

A person who agrees with the dissenting opinion in this case would most support which conclusion? (article and answer choices in

picture)

History
1 answer:
faust18 [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option B.

The court has a duty to protect student's right to free speech.

Explanation: Based on the situation if a person agree to the dissenting opinion in this case would support that court has a duty protect the student's right for freedom of speech.

Because censoring the student's speech regarding on any issue violates the right of a citizen's freedom of speech. Like on the name of teaching moral and political value if the conversation of the students is stifled then it is the violation of their right.

Because the state can not enact any law which is violating the freedom of speech. If it happens in any case the court has the duty to make sure the freedom of speech of the student.Because the court can intercept the law.

You might be interested in
If the Governor vetoes a bill is it dead?
mihalych1998 [28]

Answer:

No

Explanation:

After it is vetoed it will go back to the senates who wanted the law and they will think about it again, then they will send it back and see if its approved or vetoed.

4 0
3 years ago
Where do most people in Central America live?
a_sh-v [17]

Guatemala

Guatemala is by far the most populous, almost doubling the population of 2nd-ranked Honduras.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the purpose of the document of undelivered speech​
steposvetlana [31]

Answer: am not sure this is the answer but try it

Explanation:I seek no confrontation. I only pray and will strive for a genuine national reconciliation founded on justice.

I am prepared for the worst, and have decided against the advice of my mother, my spiritual adviser, many of my tested friends and a few of my most valued political mentors.

A death sentence awaits me. Two more subversion charges, both calling for death penalties, have been filed since I left three years ago and are now pending with the courts.

I could have opted to seek political asylum in America, but I feel it is my duty, as it is the duty of every Filipino, to suffer with his people especially in time of crisis.

I never sought nor have I been given assurances or promise of leniency by the regime. I return voluntarily armed only with a clear conscience and fortified in the faith that in the end justice will emerge triumphant.

According to Gandhi, the willing sacrifice of the innocent is the most powerful answer to insolent tyranny that has yet been conceived by God and man.

Three years ago when I left for an emergency heart bypass operation, I hoped and prayed that the rights and freedoms of our people would soon be restored, that living conditions would improve and that blood-letting would stop.

Rather than move forward, we have moved backward. The killings have increased, the economy has taken a turn for the worse and the human rights situation has deteriorated.

During the martial law period, the Supreme Court heard petitions for Habeas Corpus. It is most ironic, after martial law has allegedly been lifted, that the Supreme Court last April ruled it can no longer entertain petitions for Habeas Corpus for persons detained under a Presidential Commitment Order, which covers all so-called national security cases and which under present circumstances can cover almost anything.

The country is far advanced in her times of trouble. Economic, social and political problems bedevil the Filipino. These problems may be surmounted if we are united. But we can be united only if all the rights and freedoms enjoyed before September 21, 1972 are fully restored.

The Filipino asks for nothing more, but will surely accept nothing less, than all the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the 1935 Constitution—the most sacred legacies from the Founding Fathers.

Yes, the Filipino is patient, but there is a limit to his patience. Must we wait until that patience snaps?

The nation-wide rebellion is escalating and threatens to explode into a bloody revolution. There is a growing cadre of young Filipinos who have finally come to realize that freedom is never granted, it is taken. Must we relive the agonies and the blood-letting of the past that brought forth our Republic or can we sit down as brothers and sisters and discuss our differences with reason and goodwill?

I have often wondered how many disputes could have been settled easily had the disputants only dared to define their terms.

So as to leave no room for misunderstanding, I shall define my terms:

1. Six years ago, I was sentenced to die before a firing squad by a Military Tribunal whose jurisdiction I steadfastly refused to recognize. It is now time for the regime to decide. Order my IMMEDIATE EXECUTION OR SET ME FREE.

I was sentenced to die for allegedly being the leading communist leader. I am not a communist, never was and never will be.

2. National reconciliation and unity can be achieved but only with justice, including justice for our Muslim and Ifugao brothers. There can be no deal with a Dictator. No compromise with Dictatorship.

3. In a revolution there can really be no victors, only victims. We do not have to destroy in order to build.

4. Subversion stems from economic, social and political causes and will not be solved by purely military solutions; it can be curbed not with ever increasing repression but with a more equitable distribution of wealth, more democracy and more freedom, and

5. For the economy to get going once again, the workingman must be given his just and rightful share of his labor, and to the owners and managers must be restored the hope where there is so much uncertainty if not despair.

On one of the long corridors of Harvard University are carved in granite the words of Archibald Macleish:

“How shall freedom be defended? By arms when it is attacked by arms; by truth when it is attacked by lies; by democratic faith when it is attacked by authoritarian dogma. Always, and in the final act, by determination and faith.”

I return from exile and to an uncertain future with only determination and faith to offer—faith in our people and faith in God.

Basahin sa Filipino

4 0
4 years ago
The Constitution created a __________.
bonufazy [111]

Answer:

D. federal system of government that divides powers between the states and the national government

Explanation:

The Constitution created a <u>federal system of government that divides powers between the states and the national government</u>.

6 0
3 years ago
ILL MARK AS BRAINLESS PLS HELP
nordsb [41]

Answer:

the moon orbits earth, and earth orbits the sun. could i get brainliest?

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Popular sovereignty means that?
    6·1 answer
  • Drag and drop the words to complete the sentence. Words may be used once or not at all. Jordan and TurkeyIsrael and Saudi Arabia
    9·2 answers
  • Why did kings and priests make up the highest level of the Sumerian social pyramid?
    12·2 answers
  • What type of pollution does a company create when it clears out a forest? air water land underground
    9·2 answers
  • The United States has three branches of government. Which of the following correctly defines the role of each branch?
    15·1 answer
  • The Scopes Trial (1925) involved A)conspiracy on the part of labor to restrain tradeB) the teaching of Christianity in Tennessee
    7·2 answers
  • 5. Which of the following can NOT be considered a cause of the US use of the atomic bombs? S
    7·1 answer
  • How did agriculture advances affect chinese society druring the middle ages
    13·2 answers
  • Yeah I just need answers ??​
    5·2 answers
  • Answer this. How have wars impacted world science and culture? Give examples
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!