Answer:
Correct answer is C. It would cause Hitler to divert troops from the Russian front, thus weakening their advances there.
Explanation:
Option C is the only correct answer as the Operation Barbarossa was under way and it was presenting a real threat for the Soviets, who fought under heavy casualties. The opening of new front made situation easier for them.
Option A is not correct as that could not happen without new fronts in Europe.
B is not correct as most of the army was attacking Soviet Union.
D is not correct as this could not happen without Operation Overlord.
5. The purpose of the cartoon was to create sympathy for the African Americans, considering AJ despised them.
6. The intended audience was anyone who did not agree with AJ's veto. The cartoonist's purpose was to raise awareness to this issue.
7. The tone is obviously sympathy with a hint of bigotry considering Andrew Johnson's large head.
8. AJ was literally kicking out the Bureau with his veto, as illustrated in the cartoon. Racism is still largely prevalent in the government. Congress and the president disagreed on this issue. Newspaper headlines all around the country read, "<em>SIDE WITH CONGRESS, SIDE WITH THE NEGROES. SIDE WITH THE PRESIDENT, SIDE WITH THE WHITE MAN</em>."
Hope this helped.
Answer:
Business monopolies.
Explanation:
In the late 19th century and early 20th, most companies were looking to form monopolies. By decreasing or nullifying the competition, the business's success was assured.
As an example, the Standard Oil Company, founded by John D. Rockefeller was one of the most powerful monopolies of its time. He was able to dictate fixed products, pay whatever wages he wanted to pay to workers, and controlled the market since his competitors weren't remotely close to his manufacturing levels.
However, it didn't lack opposition. in 1890 United States Senator John Sherman, attained the passage of the Sherman Antitrust Act in 1890, which allowed the Federal Government to break up any business who was in any way prohibiting competition. This act was widely used throughout the whole century, in the fight against monopolies.
The answer is criminal cases against persons and criminal cases against property.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The state court can handle criminal cases against persons like murders and assaults. Damage to property and thefts and robberies are also heard in the state court. The state court has its own criminal status, its own court system and prosecutors.
The state court handles a greater number of crimes as opposed to the federal government. However, the states have to ensure that the criminal offenses within the state boundaries are only handled by the state courts.
