1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bonufazy [111]
3 years ago
5

The Digby company will sell 100 units (x1000) of capacity from their Drat product line. Each unit of capacity is worth $6 plus $

4 per automation rating. The Digby company will sell the capacity for 35% off. How much do they receive when the capacity is sold?
a. $3,400,000
b. $1,870,000
c. $1,190,000
d. $2,210,000
Business
2 answers:
Y_Kistochka [10]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The question is not complete, find the below complete question:

The Chester company will sell 100 units (x1000) of capacity from their Cat product line. Each unit of capacity is worth $6 plus $4 per automation rating. The Chester company will sell the capacity for 35% off. How much do they receive when the capacity is sold? Note: Automation rating is 7.0 per unit of capacity.

a) $1,870,000

b) $1,190,000

c) $2,210,000

d) $3,400,000

The correct option is C,$2,210,000

Explanation:

Th price per unit =$6+($4*automating rate) as given in the question

the price per unit=$6+($4*7)

                            =$6+$28

                            =$34

The actual worth of capacity =price per unit*number of units

number of units is 100,000

price per unit is $34

actual worth of capacity=$34*100,000

                                      =$3,400,000

Actual amount received=$3,400,000*(1-0.35)

                                       =$2,210,000.00  

The amount of received is $2,210,000

harkovskaia [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: c. $1,190,000

Explanation:

100units (X 1000) capacity

Price per unit capacity = $6

Automation per rating = $4

Automation rating = 7

Value to be recieved

= ($6 +7 x $4) x 100 x 1000(0.35)

= $34 x 100000 x 0.35

= $1,190,000

You might be interested in
Safeco’s current assets total to $20 million versus $10 million of current liabilities, while Risco’s current assets are $10 mil
dlinn [17]

Answer:

b. The transactions would lower Safeco's financial strength as measured by its current ratio but raise Risco's current ratio

Explanation:

The formula to compute the current ratio is shown below:

Current ratio = Total Current assets ÷ total current liabilities  

So,

For Safeco, the current ratio would be

= $20 million ÷ $10 million

= 2 times

And for Risco, the current ratio would be

= $10 million ÷ $20 million

= 0.5 times

After borrowing, the current ratio would be

The current assets and the current liabilities would be increased by $10 million in each side.

For Safeco, the current ratio would be

= $30 million ÷ $20 million

= 1.5 times

And for Risco, the current ratio would be

= $20 million ÷ $30 million

= 0.67 times

By comparing the current ratio, we get to know that The Safeco current ratio would be decreased whereas, the Risco current ratio is increased

Hence, option b is correct

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements are true? Check all that apply. In this labor market, a minimum wage of $9.00 is binding. In t
soldier1979 [14.2K]

Answer:

<em>1.  In this labor market, a minimum wage of $9.00 is binding : </em><em>FALSE</em>

<em>2. In the absence of price controls, a shortage puts upward pressure on wages until they rise to the equilibrium : </em><em>TRUE</em>

<em>3. If the minimum wage is set at $12.50, the market will not reach equilibrium : </em><em>TRUE</em>

<em>4. Binding minimum wages cause frictional unemployment : </em><em>FALSE</em>

Explanation:

<em><u>Question has been attached here</u></em>

Unemployment is the term used to define those who are willing and are actively seeking work but cannot find any. A minimum wage is a price control, in the form of a price floor imposed by government legislation in order to protect laborers from low wages. Paying anything below the minimum wage is against the law.

<em>1. In this labor market, a minimum wage of $9.00 is binding : </em><em>FALSE</em>

A minimum wage is binding only if it is set above the equilibrium price. In this scenario, the equilibrium price is at $12. Hence, $9 is not binding since a shortage of labor would gradually raise the price to the equilibrium.

<em>2. In the absence of price controls, a shortage puts upward pressure on wages until they rise to the equilibrium : </em><em>TRUE</em>

When there is a shortage in the market, it means that the quantity supplied is higher than the quantity demanded. With any particular commodity such as bread or rice, a shortage creates a rise in price. Just as that, a shortage of workers creates an upward pressure on the price (wage). Since there are no price ceilings, market will reach equilibrium.

<em>3. If the minimum wage is set at $12.50, the market will not reach equilibrium : </em><em>TRUE</em>

As shown in the diagram, the market equilibrium is $12. If the minimum wage was $12.50, there would be a surplus of labor (quantity supplied is higher than quantity demanded). Naturally, this may cause a downward pressure on wages until it reaches $12. However, when a minimum wage is imposed at $12.50, it cannot fall below that level. Thus, the market will not reach the equilibrium.

<em>4. Binding minimum wages cause frictional unemployment : </em><em>FALSE</em>

Frictional unemployment is a type of unemployment that occurs when workers are temporarily unemployed while switching between jobs. It is normal and occurs even in the healthiest of economies. A binding minimum wage is more likely to cause structural unemployment. This occurs when there is a mismatch between the skills of the labor force and the skills expected to be possessed by employers to do a particular job. Hence, even if jobs are available, the laborers are not suited to do them and thus are unemployed.

6 0
3 years ago
______________________: Bringing goods or services into one country from another.
dem82 [27]

Answer:

importing is the answer.

6 0
3 years ago
The rule of 70 is a measure of how long it will take for prices to __________ at a given inflation rate.
swat32

Answer:

A. double

Explanation:

Rule 70 is used to calculate the numbers of years it takes for an investment  or variable to double in value given a certain growth rate. In this case, the variable is prices and the growth rate is  inflation  rate. It is calculated by dividing number 70 by inflation rate.

For example;

Assume inflation rate is 6%, the prices will double in ; 70/6 = 11.7 years

And if inflation is 2%, the prices will double in 70/2 = 35 years

8 0
3 years ago
On January 1, 2016, Lester Company purchased 70% of Stork Corporation's $5 par common stock for $600,000. The book value of Stor
Soloha48 [4]

Answer:D. $0

Explanation:

Goodwill is the excess of the purchasing price of a company value of indentifiable net assets.. The purchasing price in this example is less than the value of the.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Vitafluid, a health drink, is available at all supermarkets. After research, the marketing team of the branddiscovered that 90 p
    8·1 answer
  • When Sebastian wrote the contract with BP for over two billion dollar s, he included targets for performance that had to be met
    9·1 answer
  • 15-year bonds 2 years ago at a coupon rate of 7.3 percent. The bonds make semiannual payments. If these bonds currently sell for
    10·1 answer
  • Consider how McKnight Valley River Park Lodge could use capital budgeting to decide whether the $ 11 comma 500 comma 000 River P
    12·1 answer
  • __________ is a strategy based on the use of IT to reduce the costs associated with the product assembly process or the way serv
    12·1 answer
  • Journalize the adjusting entry needed at December 31 for each situation. Record debits first, then credits. Check your spelling
    12·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    15·1 answer
  • 2.<br>What is the effect on the market when suppliers under invest in their businesses?​
    10·1 answer
  • What is the distinguishing feature of a market structure with monopolistic competition?
    15·1 answer
  • Mortar Corporation acquired 80 percent of Granite Corporation's voting common stock on January 1, 20X7. On December 31, 20X8, Mo
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!