I looked to the National Bureau of Economic Research, who recently published Globalization and Poverty. Here’s what I found out:
Some studies show that globalization has been associated with rising inequality, because the poor do not always share in the gains from trade. An example of this is the coffee trade. Coffee is the second most traded commodity in the world, yet most of its growers only make 10% of what it eventually sells for. However, when farmers have access to credit, technical know-how, and social safety nets such as income support, trade can benefit the world’s poor.
The book argues that export growth and incoming foreign investment have proven to reduce poverty. But, at the same time, trade and foreign investment alone are not enough to alleviate poverty. Increasing access to education and credit, as well as improved infrastructure, are necessary in order to see real progress. Echoing that idea, Harrison concludes that globalization can benefit people living in extreme poverty, but only if the appropriate complementary policies and institutions are in place.
<span>They have a command economy because the government regulates each aspect of the economy.</span>
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Judaism and Islam are both Abrahamic religions, while Hinduism belongs in its own seperate category
Answer:
plains
Explanation:
<u>It has been noted that the density of road infrastructure is higher in the plains.</u>
This is because the terrain is leveled and easier for building, which makes it more likely for cities and settlements to be built here. If the population of the region is higher, there is more need for the roads and traffic to be built.
Additionally, it is easier to drive through the plains than to through the mountains, which is why roads will be built in the plains more likely. When the terrain is leveled, <u>roads can also be built through the forests and deserts.</u>
