1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mart [117]
3 years ago
10

at common law, John, a five-year old child who had burned a neightbor's home to the ground,A. would be absolutely liable.B. woul

d be presumed incompetent. However, state could rebut.C. would be presumed competent. However, a child could rebut.D. would have a conclusive presumption in his favor of not having been responsible.E. would have committed arson.
Law
1 answer:
Evgesh-ka [11]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

C. ?

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Read this passage from the Articles of Confederation:
netineya [11]

Answer:

Making citizens of the states also citizens of the Union.

Explanation:

Through this passage, and specifically by establishing that all the free inhabitants of the states would enjoy the same rights in the other states in which they were not residents.

Thus, by guaranteeing a unity of rights throughout the territory of the Union, the Articles of Confederation sought to reaffirm the legal unity of all the states, in order to form not only a country with legal security for its inhabitants, but a nation with unified legal criteria at the government level.

7 0
3 years ago
The exclusionary rule states that if evidence is found during an illegal search, itmust be destroyed immediately.cannot be admit
LuckyWell [14K]

Answer:

Option 2 is the right answer

Explanation:

When government obtains any evidence though a conduct deemed unconstitutional (unlawful search or seizure), such evidence would be suppressed by the court. When the defendant is brought to court for eventual trial, such evidence would be inadmissible. U.S courts have used this rule in several occasions, to prevent police officers and agents of the government from abusing constitutional rights of the people.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the difference between a Bursary and a Student loan​
spin [16.1K]

Answer: The difference between a loan and a bursary is that a loan has to be paid back whilst a bursary is non-repayable.

6 0
2 years ago
You are a manager employed by a construction company that builds small venues for rock concerts, sporting events, and other acti
zalisa [80]

I work at mc donalds

8 0
3 years ago
Do you believe that the Supreme Court should practice judicial restraint
krek1111 [17]

Answer:

Judges are said to exercise judicial restraint if they are hesitant to strike down laws that are not obviously unconstitutional.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following are formal classifications to serve to serve in the Senate? Select all that apply.
    5·2 answers
  • In the early history of law enforcement
    15·1 answer
  • Definition of 1999 Constitution
    10·1 answer
  • How do you delete this
    6·1 answer
  • What is the law that protects poor service delivery​
    8·2 answers
  • Why You could speculate that is important for motorists to keep up to date with traffic laws and driving techniques?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true of an Authoritarian government?
    5·1 answer
  • What would be several advantages and disadvantages of living under a<br> Dictator?
    13·1 answer
  • The establishment clause of the first amendment has often been interpreted to mean
    11·1 answer
  • 3. What events caused<br> the expansion of<br> national power in the<br> twentieth century?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!