1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mart [117]
3 years ago
10

at common law, John, a five-year old child who had burned a neightbor's home to the ground,A. would be absolutely liable.B. woul

d be presumed incompetent. However, state could rebut.C. would be presumed competent. However, a child could rebut.D. would have a conclusive presumption in his favor of not having been responsible.E. would have committed arson.
Law
1 answer:
Evgesh-ka [11]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

C. ?

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Who proposed 30 different suggestions for why crime remained high in some areas even when there was high population turn-over?
dedylja [7]
The answer is Rodney Stark
6 0
3 years ago
Minh-Tam is a lawyer whose client told her he was guilty. The client is insistent on testifying, but Minh-Tam believes she will
RoseWind [281]
I believe B as they have a right to testy if they want to but the lawyer just shut him down in fear of losing the case so it could be either unethical or illegal
8 0
3 years ago
What amendment gives people the right to peacefully protest.
TiliK225 [7]

Answer:

The 1st Amendment

Explanation:

This is the CORE of the first amendment, and is influenced in many movements of the United States; BLM, LGBTQ, etc.

4 0
2 years ago
Which of the following statements comes closest to your
Travka [436]
B

I am studying law right now and I know this is B
5 0
2 years ago
What type of mens rea might apply in each situation?
Fynjy0 [20]

Answer:

- The mugging of the police officer: purposeful

- The theft/disappearance of the fingerprints: knowing or negligent

- The arson: purposeful or reckless

Explanation:

Mens rea means "a guilty mind" as is required to prove a crime, along with actus reus (the criminal act). A purposeful mens rea means a crime was intentionally commited. A negligent mens rea is the failure to do what a reasonable person would do. A knowing mens rea means the potential result of a criminal act (such as lending a gun to someone who intends to shoot another person). A reckless mens rea increases risk to others, like driving under the influence.

Together, actus reus and mens rea form the corpus delicti or, both the criminal act and guilty mind.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What should you do if you come in close contact during apprehension?
    15·2 answers
  • Adjust your rearview and side mirrors:
    10·2 answers
  • Part II
    15·1 answer
  • The Virginian General assembly passes constitutional legislation who ratifies it
    10·1 answer
  • 1. what is public opinion ?
    14·1 answer
  • "I am Susan. It is 1880, and I was formerly enslaved. I am a free woman now though, and
    5·2 answers
  • Is it illegal to support Christianity in russia
    11·2 answers
  • 2+2<br> a:3<br> b:5<br> c:70<br> e:none of the above
    11·2 answers
  • 8 liters is the same as how many gallons? round anwer to the nearst tenth
    7·2 answers
  • What is the difference between republicans and democratic?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!