The Miranda warning is a statement that police is requires to give to criminal suspects in police custody. This warning advises them of their right to remain silent and their right to refuse to answer questions.
Opponents of this practice argue that by having this process in place, police investigations can sometimes be undermined. I, however, believe that this should not outweigh the protection of individual rights. If the police is properly trained, there is no reason why they would not be able to find the information they need despite the warning, and despite the person's right to remain silent. Moreover, it is important to protect this right for the accused person as well, as it makes it more likely for him or her to have a fair trial.
Answer:
Beveridge supports the Open Door policy because of potential economic benefits, while Carnegie opposes it because of possible economic costs
Explanation:
According to the two passages in the debate over the United States’ Open Door policy in the late 1800s and early 1900s, the statement that best contrasts the two points of view between Beveridge and Carnegie is that Beveridge supports the Open Door policy because of potential economic benefits, while Carnegie opposes it because of possible economic costs
10 million bricks is the answer.
Reign of Terror<span> (June 1793–July 1794) Phase of the French Revolution. It began with the overthrow of the Girondins and the ascendancy of the Jacobins under Robespierre.</span>
Answer:
environmental, social advocacy,human rights work, developing society,
Explanation: