Compare Eurymachus, the speaker in the first passage, to Odysseus, the speaker in the second passage Odysseus and Eurymachus similaras Both are powerful motivators.
<h3>What are Odysseus and Eurymachu's relationship?</h3>
In this poem, we're delivered to Odysseus and Eurymachus. Odysseus and Eurymachus are very special from every other, they have got special personalities and behaviors. Eurymachus is arrogant, and disrespectful and takes gain of the hospitality of the people, in contrast to Udisseuu who's represented as a real hero and gentleman.
Odyssey is one of the primary epic poems of Ancient Greece, attributed to Homer. It is a series of the Iliad, every other painting credited to the author, and is an essential poem withinside the Western canon. Historically, it's miles the second - the primary being the Iliad itself - the paintings of Western literature.
Read more about the Odysseus and Eurymachus:
brainly.com/question/5527678
#SPJ1
Answer:
EM FOR MY FRIENDS EMMUSSA, AND
DE-ATH OF CALLMEBOB ON ROB-LOX
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
In 'The Snow-Storm' Emerson delves into the themes of nature, and the power of natural forces, and creation/construction. The mood is ... Emerson makes use of several poetic techniques in 'The Snow-Storm'. These include, but ... The third and fourth lines of the first stanza are a good example of this technique.
Something is plagiarism if one takes material from another source and uses it without pointing toward that source, thus making it appear that it is originally written.
1. No, this is not plagiarism since she herself is the original writer, thus she is not stealing content from anybody else.<span>
2. According to Casey Berry of Sciences Ltd., "Only 6% of students wash their hands after class." This first choice is not plagiarism, since the student has cited the researcher Casey Berry, and has enclosed the directly copied statement in quotation marks. In contrast, the second choice mentions "a recent study" without any direct mention of who did the study, and it copies the conclusion verbatim without using quotation marks.
3. This is not plagiarism, since she places a hyperlink to the source, thus acknowledging that what she has written is not her own original material. However, this is considered bad practice, to simply link to a source without describing what it has done or which parts specifically you have taken from it. You would not probably be sued in court for plagiarism, but it is still advisable to describe what the source has done.
4. No, this is not plagiarism. He has used quotation marks for direct quotes. The paraphrased information does not need quotation marks. Hyperlinks and attributions have been provided for each, so there are no issues with this kind of writing.
5. Yes, this is plagiarism. The BlogMutt writer got information from another post (which may or may not have been original material, we do not know), and did not attribute that post. Furthermore, this write-up is for a customer, not merely for discussion in forums, so pretending that the information on the post is his own is not only plagiarism, but it is also business dishonesty as he is stealing someone's work and selling it to a customer as his own.</span>
Answer:
C) Gathering a list of credible sources to use in her paper