Answer:
$2.25 per unit
Explanation:
The computation of the cost per equivalent is shown below:
= Total conversion cost ÷ total units completed
where,
Total conversion cost is
= Beginning work in process conversion cost + cost of conversion added
= $20,250 + 271,125
= 291,375
And, the number of units is
= Units completed + work in process ending inventory units × completion percentage
= 115,700 units + 23,000 units × 60%
= 115,700 + 13,800
= 129,500 units
So, the cost per equivalent unit for conversion cost is
= $291,375 ÷ 129,500 units
= $2.25 per unit
Answer:
d.regardless of what Ocean knew or could have discovered.
Explanation:
The uniform commercial code are a set of rules that govern transactions involving sale of goods. One of such rules is the implied warranty of merchantability.
When goods are sold there is an implied warranty that the item will perform up to a particular level.
For example if one buys a television not is expected that the television will work. If it does not come on, implied warranty has been breached.
So in this case regardless of what Ocean knew or could have discovered, selling defective goods is a breach of implied warranty of merchantability.
Answer:
The correct option is 2. $50,200
Explanation:
Please see below the required journals for the transactions that occurred:
Debit Allowance for doubtful accounts $31,800
Credit Accounts receivable $31,800
(<em>To record write-off of accounts receivable)</em>
Debit Accounts receivable $2,340,000
Credit Sales revenue $2,340,000
<em>(To record credit sales during the year)</em>
Debit Cash $1,910,000
Credit Accounts receivable $1,910,000
<em>(To record collection on account)</em>
- The effect of the above journals on allowance for doubtful account is a reduction. Since Dinty already assessed its allowance for doubtful account to be $82,000, bad debt expense required will be $50,200 ($82,000 - $31,800).
- The balance in accounts receivable will be $2,340,000 - $1,910,000 - $31,800 = $398,200.
Answer:
The three brand are famous soft drink brands utilized by individuals. It very well may be somewhat muddled for deciding the favored taste of the buyers. This exploratory plan is flawed as a result of the potential issues engaged with it. The test here is that the members may not give an exact rating. They may rate it the equivalent. There is an issue with this trial as one of the soft drinks going level may affect the rating of the members. As indicated by Malhotra (2010) the most widely recognized strategy utilized for testing is combined correlation. This can be utilized by the members for successful examination.
The perplexing variable in the investigation incorporates the measure of time that went between the tasting of various soft drinks. The temperature of the soft drink additionally indicates the inclination of the members.
The measure of time that has gone since the members had the beverage likewise chooses their inclination level.
I would utilize correlation strategy wherein irregular examining will be picked. The refrigerated soft drinks will be given. A sense of taste chemical will be given after each drink to clean their taste. This will incorporate in excess of five preliminaries for effectiveness.
Answer:
Annual rate 0.017
Explanation:
Computation of the annual rate on the real bond.
Using this formula
Annual rate = Par Zero coupon inflation index/(1+r) ^Numbers of years =Inflation-indexed bond
Let plug in the formula
Annual rate=100 / (1 + r) ^10 = 84.49
Annual rate= (100 / 84.49)^1 /10 − 1
Annual rate=(1.18357)^0.1-1
Annual rate=1.016-1
Annual rate=0.017
Therefore the annual rate of return will be 0.017
