Answer:
The answer is B
Explanation:
GDP is no affected by Scott's production of the jewelry box.
Answer:
The correct answer would be $5
Explanation:
The formula to use is "Expected return to player" which is
E(x) = x.p(x)
where x is the return to player if they win
and p(x) is the probability of winning.
So here,
x = $100 (return to player for winning)
p(x) = 1/50 (probability of winning)
Therefore expected return to player is
E(x) = x.p(x)
= $100 x 1/50
= $100/50
= $2
Cost: $7
Expected return to player is $2.
Therefore Loss (to player) is Cost minus Expected return
= $7 - $2 = $5 <---- expected value for the carnival to gain,
The loss to the player is the carnival's gain. It's $5.
Answer:
A condition that may cause a fee simple absolute to become a fee simple defeasible is:
The owner gifts the property to another entity
Explanation:
Jane holds a landed property as a fee simple absolute, therefore, she has absolute ownership. This implies that her ownership of the property lasts forever unless she transfers it. Jane can do whatever she wants with the property. It is unlike a defeasible fee, which is simply a fee simple interest in land which Jane can lose by the occurrence of a specified event.
Answer:
rationalizing
Explanation:
Rationalization in psychology or logic is indeed a defensive mechanism wherein problematic actions or emotions are defended and clarified in an obviously logical or rational way to escape the mechanistic explanation, and are rendered actively bearable or perhaps even impressive and preferable by convincing methods.
Rationalization facilitates unreasonable or unacceptable behavior motivations or emotions and sometimes includes hypothesizing ad haste. This cycle goes from completely aware to mostly unaware. Individuals rationalize for different reasons.
