Answer:
A base salary of $500,000 plus a stock option package for 250,000 shares, with 20% of shares maturing at the end of each of the next five years
Explanation:
This options will force the employee to stay in the firm for at least 5 years
Also it will tie his contribution to the market share
So their interest will be alinged with the company's interest of increasing his value and project better earnings through the five years program.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": The internal control structure.
Explanation:
The internal control structure of a company encompasses the firm's organizational objectives in regards to ensuring policies and federal laws, accurate operating information and accounting records, protecting the company's from threats, and measuring employees' performance to help them improve their efficiency.
Answer:
The answer is given below;
Explanation:
Land Account As at September 30,2022
Amount in $
Land Value 570,000
Broker Commission 50,000
Legal Fees 8,000
Title Insurance 25,000
Cost of Razing 89,000
Total 742,000
Office Building-Total Cost Amount in $
Contract price to barnett 4,400,000
Plans and Blueprint 26,000
Design and Supervision 98,000
March-December 2021
Borrowing Costs 1,040,000*12%*9/12 93,600
January-September 2022
Borrowing Costs 3,000,000*12%*9/12 270,000
Total Cost 4,887,600
Answer:
...when that project will have the same level of risk as the firm's current operations
Explanation:
Weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is the company's cost of capital based on its proportion of equity and debt used in its capital structure. It can be used as the discount rate for calculating the present value of future expected cashflows of a project if the project is determined to be of similar risk to the company's operations; meaning that the estimated beta of the project is the same as the beta of the firm.
Answer: B) Correct Incorrect
Explanation:
Whilst it was generally believed at some point that raising taxes and Government Spending by the same amount would have no effect, research has disproven this thought.
This is because it was shown that an increase in Government Spending leads to a larger increase in GDP than an increase in taxes reduces it.
This is because when the Government spends money, the Multiplier effect of Government Spending is always 1 more than that of the Taxes therefore raising taxes and spending by the same amounts still increases the Real GDP because Government Spending will create more income than taxes will take.
Necco is right, Packard is wrong.
