Answer:
A, B, E
Explanation:
A: Euthanasia must be legal for it to be morally <em>and</em> legally permissible. If it is illegal, it's basically considered murder in the area.
B: Euthanasia means to relieve someone of their pain by ending their life. This is a very grave decision that has irreversible consequences. If there are other ways to relieve the patient's suffering that are much less harmful, they should come before ending the patient's life.
C: Ending a life for the benefit of others is immoral because it is an irreversible consequence. You are taking the life of another human for other people to temporarily feel better. That is not okay and should never be considered as a justifiable factor.
D: You would be taking the life of someone else to make yourself an exemplar for others. That's basically exploiting their death for your benefit. That is immoral because you are not considering the best interest and well-being of the patient.
E: The doctor and patient must have a previous agreement to provide euthanasia because if there was no such agreement, it would be against or without the patient's consent. This would be immoral because you are not taking into consideration the decisions and rights of the patient.
-
These are my opinions, but it's up to you to decide the best options based on your morals and social customs. Good luck!
Answer:
The department of homeland security
Explanation:
Each of the given choices is an agency under the control of the director of national intelligence except The department of homeland security.
Hope it helps!
Answer:
An individual is a member (a part) of a society. The individual is supported by that society, and helps to support others in that society. When an individual needs help, society provides that. That could be by means of having friends or being transported to a hospital. Society also improves the lives of individuals. It helps them be connected to others and have the ability to access goods and services (for money or for free).
Explanation:
n/a
