9514 1404 393
Answer:
13.3 m
Step-by-step explanation:
Let d represent the length of the diagonal. Then the length of the rectangle is (d-2) and the width is (d-6). The area is the product of length and width, so is ...
A = LW
83 = (d -2)(d -6) = d² -8d +12
71 = d² -8d . . . . . . . . subtract 12 to get the constant out of the way
d² -8d +16 = 87 . . . . add (-8/2)² = 16 to both sides to complete the square
(d -4)² = 87 . . . . . . . write as a square
d -4 = √87 . . . . . . . positive square root
d = 4 +√87 ≈ 13.3 . . . . add 4
The diagonal is about 13.3 meters long.
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
If you check to see if the side lengths actually correspond to those of a rectangle, you find that they do not. <em>The geometry described here is impossible</em>. The rectangle with the proposed relations between sides and diagonal would have a diagonal of about 12.899 m and an area of about 75.19 m².
1/3x +2/3x>-3/4x+1/3
1/3x+2/3x+3/4x<1/3
1/3x ×4= 4/12
2/3x ×4= 8/12
3/4 ×3= 6/12
18/12x<1/3
x<.22
First we need to convert cm to mm
45 cm = 450 mm
Now our ratio looks like this
60/450
We can divide both by 30 and once we do that our ratio will look like this:
2/15
That means the answer is B
Answer:
Two differences: A polynomial inequality (PI) can always be replaced by a PI with one side zero. A rational inequality (RI) can not, because you do not know the sign of the denominator; a(x)b(x)>c(x)d(x) can not safely be replaced by a(x)d(x)−b(x)c(x)b(x)d(x)>0 because b(x) and/or d(x) might change signs unexpectedly.
Step-by-step explanation: