Based on my experiences so far, the approach to geometry that I prefer is: Euclidean Geometry. This is because the problems are easy to visualize since they are restricted to two-dimensional planes.
<h3>Which approach is easier to extend beyond two dimensions?</h3>
The approach that is easier to extend beyond two dimensions is Euclidean Geometry. Again, this is because of how it deals with shapes and visualization of the same.
Take for instance a triangle; it is easy to go from a two-dimensional equilateral triangle to a square pyramid.
<h3> What are some situations in which one approach to geometry would prove more beneficial than the other?</h3>
Analytical geometry is a superior technique for discovering objects (points, curves, and planes) based on their qualities in some situations than Euclidean geometry is in others (for example, when employing topography or building charts).
Learn more about Euclidean Geometry at;
brainly.com/question/2251564
#SPJ1
The cost of 32.57ft^2 is Rs. 18,239.2 which is the cost of renting one tent.
Data;
- Height = 48cu = 48 cubic feet = 3.63 feet
- edge length = 3ft
- area = ?
<h3>Area of a Square Pyramid</h3>
The formula of a square pyramid is given as
Let's substitute the values and solve for the area of the square pyramid.
Since the cost of 1 square foot = Rs. 560
32.57 ft^2 = x
The cost of 32.57ft^2 is Rs. 18,239.2 which is the cost of renting one tent.
Learn more on area of square pyramid here;
brainly.com/question/22744289
Let
x = # of <span>$5 dollar bills
y = </span># of <span>$10 dollar bills
x + y = 12 so x = 12 - y
5x + 10y = 95
substitute </span>x = 12 - y into 5x + 10y = 95
5x + 10y = 95
5(12 - y) + 10y = 95
60 - 5y + 10y = 95
5y = 35
y = 7
x = 12 - 7 = 5
answer
# of <span>$5 dollar bills = 5
</span># of $10 dollar bills = 7
Answer:
yes well hi and hit the WOW
Step-by-step explanation:
