Answer:
Senate
Explanation:
The Constitution names the vice president of the United States as the president of the Senate.
This depends on what day & time
For example, we will use the Cold War:
1. About Money: The US funded many projects & countries with money, equipment, supplies, & resources, to try to help rebuild/ build up their countries, while trying to stop communism from spreading it's control over those same countries. The USSR also tried to gain control of territories by taking them over militarily, or sending resources & setting up Communist governments that supported the USSR. This usually costed a lot of money, & sometimes put strain to their economy (especially for the USSR's)
2. About Mail: The US used censors during the Cold War, and tried to find communist sympathizers and communist spies that were located inside the US. They would read people's mails to find out if they were pro-communist, and take decisive action depending on what it was.
3. About the Military: Both sides supplied military & logistical needs to their allies, as seen in the Korean, Vietnam, Bay of Pigs Invasion, etc wars. Take for example the Korean war. The US & the NATO sent support to help stem off the Communist onslaught, & today they are still split. (this is technically a success, because this was their first objective anyways). Another example is the Vietnam War. With the knowledge of terrain, support from China & the USSR, the Viet Cong was able to defeat the US, as the US soldiers were unfamiliar with the area, and the support for the war was growing cold. As seen in the Bay of Pigs Invasion, the US & USSR did not intervene directly. The USSR trained & supplied Fidel Castro, while the US used the CIA to train the exiled people to try to topple Castro's government. This failed, & was a win for the USSR.
These are the examples during the Cold War for the 3 points
hope this helps
Answer:
Well I think ( I am a Christian) the crusades were effective.
Explanation:
this is because many people converted to Christian. today many countries feel threaten by Christians and closed their country to missionaries. the effect on even Muslim states had some change! To the other Christians, this was a wake call to get active and spread the word! god bless.
Many contemporary British playwrights begin their careers in which British alternative to commercial theatre was performance art.
Performance art is a time-based art form that incorporates acting, poetry, music, dance, and painting into a live presentation to an audience or onlookers .
The performing arts are any arts or skills that require a public performance in front of an audience. Acting, singing, and dancing are some examples. Opera, theatre, magic or illusion performances, mime, public speaking are examples of Performing Arts.
It can be any situation that involves four basic elements: time, space, the performer's body, or presence in a medium, and a relationship between performer and audience.
To know more about performance art here
brainly.com/question/9543413
#SPJ4
Answer:
- Hobbes' interpretation of the social contract believed human beings were inherently at odds with each other and therefore needed an authoritarian government to rule over them.
- Lockes' interpretation of the social contract believed that human beings are morally neutral by nature, and can live side by side without a government -- but that creating a government makes society better.
Explanation:
Both English philosophers, Hobbes and Locke, believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people. But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.
Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan</em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War. He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and harmful toward one another as a result. Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.
John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government</em> in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England. Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings. Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.
In teaching about Hobbes and Locke, I've often described the difference between them in this way. If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way. Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved. Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith. But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke. :-)
