When a novel is using the first person point of view, the reader is getting the impression that he is a part of a story, he is completely immersed in it. First person narrators tend to be more subjective and closer to the reader in that they think about what the reader may think, and not just narrate the events. On the other had, third person narrators are completely different - they give off this vibe of distance, and they are quite objective, usually tending to just narrate what is going on around them.
Hope this helps!
1. <u>I would say this is true,</u> making connections is an excellent way to help people understand the meaning of a subject. Especially if you connect something hard to understand with something that is easier to understand.
2. <u>The answer for this question would be D.</u> If you are looking to understand all perspectives on a topic, you would want to explore opinions from people who both support the topic in addition to people who oppose, as well. This will guarantee that when you write about a topic. you are not biased to one opinion more than another. You have to do your research equally.
3.<u> My answer for this question would be A. Theme.</u> The theme of a story is the known as the underlying message or "big idea". I chose A for this question by taking notice of key words from the question such as "<em>main point</em>" and "<em>statement</em>". Only in the theme of a story will you find the story's statement.
Answer: It was the first high school football game and I was so excited; I had been looking forward to this day since the first day of school. I was now part of a team and I was loving every minute. Just as they call my name I take off running full of anticipation for the first play of the game. Before I made it to the sidelines, I felt my knee pop and down I went. Needless to say, my spirits were crushed and I never got to experience that first game play.
Explanation:
An example of a very effective villain who stands against the protagonists is Count Olaf from the book series <em>A Series of Unfortunate Events</em>. This series follows the life of the Baudelaire orphans. After both their parents die in a fire, they are sent to their new guardian, a man named Count Olaf. However, Olaf has no interest in caring for them. In fact, he only wants to take advantage of them in order to get their fortune.
The reason why Count Olaf is a good villain is because he contrasts the heroes in several ways. For example, while the heroes care about their family and friends deeply, Count Olaf is selfish and only cares about himself. This is demonstrated by the fact that Count Olaf does not have friends. He only has henchmen. Another reason is the fact that Count Olaf cares a lot about money, while money is not an important concern to the orphan children. Finally, Count Olaf is willing to commit terrible crimes and deeds in order to achieve what he wants, while the children are moral and responsible.
In conclusion, Count Olaf is a remarkable villain because he contrasts with the heroes, who are the Baudelaire orphans. Some of the ways in which he does so is by caring about himself and money more than he cares about anything else, as well as having very loose morals.
Answer by JKismyhusbandbae: B. The author uses an omniscient narrator to reveal the details of the railroad accident taking place far away.
Why: Josephine reveals the incident of the railroad and does not talk about the closeness or anything about her sisters at least not that much. She also does not really care for her husband she did not grieve him but wasn't exactly excited he was dead.
