Answer:
The two categories of sources of credit are formal and informal sources.
Explanation:
The formal source of credit as the name implies is an official means of obtaining loans. Its features include,
1. It is administered by corporate institutions like banks and other lending bodies.
2. It is regulated by a body in the relevant country.
3. There are recognized and standard interest rates that must be paid by the borrower.
4. It is guided by laws which both parties are expected to keep.
The Informal sources of credit are unofficial means of borrowing funds There features include,
1. They can be obtained from friends, relatives, and acquaintances.
2. There are no standard interest rates as these are determined by the lenders.
3. There are no official bodies to regulate the lending process.
4. They are mostly used by poor businessmen and women who need small loans.
13 climates hope this helps have a nice day
Answer:
Jesus
Explanation:
The Father-God of Jesus after Jesus' death and Resurrection becomes—for his disciples—the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ (e.g., 2 Corinthians 1:3), who revealed his love through the sacrifice of his Son who was sent into the world.
Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.
His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.
Answer: A)
Explanation:
A space enclosed within two sets of double solid yellow lines is off-limits and exists as a buffer zone to keep cars apart.
Two sets of double lines that are yellow are indicating those cars who are on the road and they are changing tracks restricted so the answer A is correct and these lines can keep cars apart in a buffer zone.
