Answer:
Explanation:
A. is not the right answer. They were also moved to the Texas Panhandle
<u>B. is the right answer. US government relocated many of the native communities to the so-called Indian Territory, which occupied present-day Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, and part of Iowa, as well as to Texas Panhandle. </u>Kiowa tribes were moved mostly from the Montana, and Comanche tribes from Wyoming.
C. this is not the correct answer. These are mostly parts of Oklahoma, but Kiowa and Comanche tribes were moved to other parts of Kansas, Nebraska, and Texas as well.
D. is not the right answer. These peoples were moved to the Texas Panhandle, not the northwestern part of the country. Also, it was the whole Indian Territory, not just southeastern parts.
<span>Oswiu, <span>King of Northumbria</span></span>
Elected officials who are sent to a government seat to do the will of the people from their designated districts are called "representatives", since the "represent" the people who elected them.
Not sure but hope what I know help a little...Slavery was “an unqualified evil to the negro, the white man, and the State,” said Abraham Lincoln in the 1850s. Yet in his first inaugural address, Lincoln declared that he had “no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with slavery in the States where it exists.” He reiterated this pledge in his first message to Congress on July 4, 1861, when the Civil War was three months old.<span>Did You Know?When it took effect in January 1863, the Emancipation Proclamation freed 3.1 million of the nation's 4 million slaves.</span>
What explains this apparent inconsistency in Lincoln’s statements? And how did he get from his pledge not to interfere with slavery to a decision a year later to issue an emancipation proclamation? The answers lie in the Constitution and in the course of the Civil War. As an individual, Lincoln hated slavery. As a Republican, he wished to exclude it from the territories as the first step to putting the institution “in the course of ultimate extinction.”
