The statement above is based on the assumption that improved labour standards, economic achievement and social security are not always possible. The correct option is A. It can be seen from the passage that the collaboration of all countries is needed in order to secure for all improved standards, economic achievement and social security; which means that without collaboration, these things will not be achievable.
-6-14i you FOIL the form you have to get the standard form
George Washington's view on bigotry was that people who do not value variety and religious freedom are bigots and this is what is found in Patel's point of view which is that people need to work together regardless of their religion.
Answer:
<em>C. How on Earth, Jenny thought, could the concert have already started when she had left an hour early?</em>
Explanation:
This is the answer because, it says that "Jenny thought" and if it was using a 1st person point of view it would simply say "I thought". And it also says that when "she" had left an hour early. If it was a 1st person point of view it would also simply say "I". And it couldn't be option A, because it said "we" when the sentence (if it was trying to be in third person) should've used "they".
It can't have been option B, because it says, "in my experience" and if you were writing it in first person it would have been "in their experience", or "in (name)'s experience".
It also couldn't have been option D. Simply because it says, "As for me" and uses "I" instead of they, she, he, or even their name.
To make it short, option A, B, and D, do not have the correct wording to be a third-person sentence.
So, in conclusion, the only third-person sentence is option C.
And that's my answer.
