How did Spanish participation help the Continental forces in the American Revolution? Select the two

History

2 answers:

kotegsom [21]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The answers are C AND D

Explanation:

As a French ally, Spain entered the Revolutionary war by helping Americans through sending them supplies and weapons throughout couple of routes, which were usually going through New Orleans and up to Mississippi river.

Of course, Spain had its other reason for entering the war, mostly to protect its realm on the soil of Northern America. During the Gulf Coast Campaign they managed to defeat the British forces and when the peace treaty was signed Spain received sh <u>British West Florida</u>.

iren [92.7K]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Its actually A

Explanation:

Spain blockaded the coast to stop British supply ships

You might be interested in

Why can't the United States file charges in the International Court of Justice?

aleksandr82 [10.1K]

United States participation in the ICC treaty regime would also be unconstitutional because it would allow the trial of U.S. citizens for crimes committed on U.S. soil, which are otherwise entirely within the judicial power of the United States.

4 0

2 years ago

William bradford was the first governor of the massachusetts bay colony. true false

Svetlanka [38]

William Bradford was a Massachusetts governor, but not the first. It is FALSE. I hope I helped.

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

When does american revolution started?

adelina 88 [10]

1775 – 1783
Here how it started: In April 1775 British soldiers, called lobsterbacks because of their red coats, and minutemen—the colonists' militia—exchanged gunfire at Lexington and Concord in Massachusetts. Described as "the shot heard round the world," it signaled the start of the American Revolution and led to the creation of a new nation.

3 0

3 years ago

When the United States entered World War I who filled demand for civilian workers?

beks73 [17]

Women filled the demand for civilian workers

6 0

2 years ago

How did African slavery differ regionally in eighteenth-century North America?

Ivenika [448]

African slavery differed regionally in 18th century based on the product being developed.

During this time period, South Carolina was known for the harvesting of rice. The terrain of this state created ideal conditions for this crop to grow. On the other hand, states like Virginia grew tobacco because of their climate and growing season. This was then extremely different from slaves in the North. Considering the short growing season and frigid temperatures, many slaves did not work on plantations. Rather they worked in the shipping or boating industry since that is what the Northern economy relied on.

5 0

3 years ago