Answer:
Americans opposed slavery because they started to think that it was inhumane.
Explanation:
Having one race that is superior to the other is very inhumane, and it was also incompatible with Christianity. Thus, they made amendments such as the 13th, which made slavery outlawed and the 14th, which makes everyone under American law equal.
I think so. <em>Teenagers would have to think twice before practicing cyberbuIlyng. It would not only discourage people, but also serves as a reference of how much authorities and legislators are concerned about this issue. And with the time, these stricter laws with the right focus, the tendency is for cyberbullying to decrease</em>.
<u>As a result</u>, it will attract society´s attention for further discussion of the topic (possibly other solutions).
The creation of more severe laws contributes in the sense that this type of real problem has the punitive aspect as a highlight for the potential cyberbully.
<span> the Rivers are absolutely essential to understanding these two areas of culture. They both flood annually, providing some guarantee of grain and water, and provide much needed shipping lanes for the civilizations. Both were close to the mediterannean sea, persian gulf and red sea - ideal trading opportunities.
Egypt is essentially enclosed by desert and sea, making it a nation with natural boundaries. Mesopotamia is similar in that is is bordered by desert to the east and south, mountains to the north and sea to the west.
Both are quite literally "Cradles of civilization".</span>
Answer:
binding arbitration would end unrestricted economies all through a large part of the economy. Government authorities could direct wages and working conditions to any organization sufficiently disastrous to be coordinated.
binding arbitration would do the same amount of harm to laborers' privileges. They would lose all resources as of now accessible to them. Endorsers would lose their entitlement to decide on sanctioning the agreement they should work under, and they couldn't strike over the last agreement, regardless of how awful it is. Restricting intervention gives laborers an agreement if they like it.
binding arbitration could likewise cost laborers their annuities. Associations are probably going to press the mediator to constrain recently coordinated specialists to join a multi-manager association benefits plan, and in enterprises where these plans are normal, the judge would almost certainly concur.
Explanation:
With organization enrollment in consistent decay, Coordinated Work faces a decision. It can accomplish the difficult work important to shed the New Arrangement model that actually shapes its obsolete approach and adjust to the present economy. Or on the other hand it can utilize its political muscle and get Congress to make it simpler to constrain laborers to join.
No because they took wwwye 69 apew and get 9
