Based on this information and the components of self-regulation, Sherry is implementing <u>self-evaluation</u>.
<h3>What are self-regulation?</h3>
It is the ability to analyze the environment and the set of processes that we carry out in order to successfully manage ourselves whose components are self-observation, self-evaluation and self-reinforcement.
Self-evaluation component refers to the fact that the person determines some criteria that mark or guide the objectives that he wants to achieve, these criteria can contrast whether the change in behavior is the one he is looking for or not, according to his objectives.
Therefore, we can conclude that based on this information and the components of self-regulation, Sherry is implementing self-evaluation.
Learn more about self-evaluation here: brainly.com/question/26304121
Answer:
$6,237
Explanation:
The computation of the cash required for the payment is shown below:
= Merchandise amount - return and allowances - discount
= $7,500 - $1,200 - $63
= $6,237
The discount = (Merchandise amount - return and allowances) × discount rate
= ($7,500 - $1,200) × 1%
= $63
Simply we consider the items i.e merchandise purchase amount, returned merchandise amount and the discount given amount
Answer:
C.− NA −NA + −NA
Explanation:
As we know that
The depreciation expense is a non cash expense which is to be charged every year and shown in the income statement
Plus it also reduced the value of the asset and stockholder equity as a retained earning but at the same time it increases the expenses due to which the net income reduced and it does not have any impact on the cash flow statements
Hence, the appropriate option is c.
Answer:
A: "Past information can get in the way of learning new things."
Answer:
B. is not liable because Mike was on a frolic of his own.
Explanation:
Mike who is a dispatch rider, decided to see his girlfriend, Jackie, who lived 50 miles off his pizza route. He had an accident while driving to his girlfriend's, and injured a pedestrian, Chuck due to his negligent driving.
Under the circumstances, Frank's Pizza isn't liable because Mike was on a frolic of his own. Mike embarking on a 50 mile drive to see his girlfriend is frolicsome and outside the scope of his employment as a delivery agent.
Hence, this will absolve his employer from any liability as he wasn't working on the designated route at the time.
