1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Jlenok [28]
3 years ago
5

Why was it difficult to build new businesses in the South? (1 point)

History
2 answers:
jasenka [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

There were not many banks to finance businesses :)

Explanation:

jek_recluse [69]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is C. There were not many banks to finance businesses.

In 1860 the South was still predominantly agricultural, highly dependent upon the sale of staples to a world market. By 1815, cotton was the most valuable export in the United States, by 1840 it was worth more than all other exports combined. But while the southern states produced 2/3 of the world’s supply of cotton, the South had little manufacturing capability, about 20% of the railroad tracks, but only 13% of the nation’s banks.

You might be interested in
SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME ASAP GIVING BRAINLIEST!!!!!! 95 POINTS!
Ahat [919]

Answer: Pick the first one, has a lot of info you can write about. Search up information about it to help you. You can say that credit cards have money in them. And say more stuff about the, like how they work

6 0
3 years ago
What was the impact and/or relationship between Jim Crow laws / Jim Crow Era and the
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

In September 1895, Booker T. Washington, the head of the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, stepped to the podium at the Atlanta Cotton States Exposition and implored white employers to “cast down your bucket where you are” and hire African Americans who had proven their loyalty even throughout the South’s darkest hours. In return, Washington declared, southerners would be able to enjoy the fruits of a docile work force that would not agitate for full civil rights. Instead, blacks would be “In all things that are purely social . . . as separate as the fingers.”

Washington called for an accommodation to southern practices of racial segregation in the hope that blacks would be allowed a measure of economic freedom and then, eventually, social and political equality. For other prominent blacks, like W. E. B. Du Bois who had just received his PhD from Harvard, this was an unacceptable strategy since the only way they felt that blacks would be able to improve their social standing would be to assimilate and demand full citizenship rights immediately.

Regardless of which strategy one selected, it was clear that the stakes were extremely high. In the thirty years since the Civil War ended African Americans had experienced startling changes to their life opportunities. Emancipation was celebrated, of course, but that was followed by an intense debate about the terms of black freedom: who could buy or sell property, get married, own firearms, vote, set the terms of employment, receive an education, travel freely, etc. Just as quickly as real opportunities seemed to appear with the arrival of Reconstruction, when black men secured unprecedented political rights in the South, they were gone when northern armies left in 1877 and the era of Redemption began. These were the years when white Southerners returned to political and economic power, vowing to “redeem” themselves and the South they felt had been lost. Part of the logic of Redemption revolved around controlling black bodies and black social, economic, and political opportunities. Much of this control took the form of so-called Jim Crow laws—a wide-ranging set of local and state statutes that, collectively, declared that the races must be segregated.

In 1896, the year after Washington’s Atlanta Cotton Exposition speech, the Supreme Court declared in Plessy v. Ferguson that racial segregation was constitutional. It would take fifty-eight years for that decision to be reversed (in Brown v. Board of Education). In the meantime, African Americans had to negotiate the terms of their existence through political agitation, group organizing, cultural celebration, and small acts of resistance. Much of this negotiation can be seen in the history of the Great Migration, that period when blacks began to move, generally speaking, from the rural South to the urban North. In the process, African Americans changed the terms upon which they exercised their claims to citizenship and rights as citizens.

There are at least two factual aspects of the Great Migration that are important to know from the start: 1) the black migration generally occurred between 1905 and 1930 although it has no concrete beginning or end and 2) from the standpoint of sheer numbers, the Great Migration was dwarfed by a second migration in the 1940s and early 1950s, when blacks became a majority urban population for the first time in history. Despite these caveats, the Great Migration remains important in part because it marked a fundamental shift in African American consciousness. As such, the Great Migration needs to be understood as a deeply political act.

Migration was political in that it often reflected African American refusal to abide by southern social practices any longer. Opportunities for southern blacks to vote or hold office essentially disappeared with the rise of Redemption, job instability only increased in the early twentieth century, the quality of housing and education remained poor at best, and there remained the ever-looming threat of lynch law if a black person failed to abide by local social conventions. Lacking even the most basic ability to protect their own or their children’s bodies, blacks simply left.

3 0
3 years ago
Does the Hamilton Musical accurately depict the debate between Hamilton
allochka39001 [22]

Answer:

Whattever Hamilton is for, Jefferson is aganist and the musical clearly captures the differences.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which could cause a naturalized citizen to lose his or her citizenship?
Sati [7]
What could cause you to lose your citizenship of a certain country would be if you decided to betray your country for some reason in some way. This could be done in multiple fashions, one being if you're in the army and you give out a top military secret. This cold make you lose citizenship. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When did congress approve of the Declaration of Independence?
Natalija [7]
.Congress  didn't exist for at least 13 years after the
Declaration of Independence (1776 - 1789).

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was adolf hitler's point of view and all of his supporters' point of view during world war ii?
    6·1 answer
  • What did Johnson do to improve Education
    7·2 answers
  • How did north and South America become populated <br><br> 5-10 sentences
    10·2 answers
  • he ending of the Pullman Strike is significant because it A) demonstrated unions’ superiority and solidarity. B) demonstrated th
    11·1 answer
  • Scandal of the second Reagan administration involving sales of arms to Iran in partial exchange for release of hostages in Leban
    9·2 answers
  • During the D-Day landings, which invading force met the greatest resistance
    5·1 answer
  • A0 is credited with inventing the first useful telescope.
    8·2 answers
  • Arguments supporting the proposition the American revolution was a true revolution
    6·1 answer
  • HOW DID SOME INDIVIDUALS BALANCE ABOLITIONISM AND THE CULTURE OF BEING 19TH-CENTURY WOMEN IN THE UNITED STATES?
    12·1 answer
  • TAYAHIN
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!