1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
motikmotik
3 years ago
13

Think about what you know about the Espionage and Sedition Acts. Now apply that to some real-world situations. Check any action

that would have been outlawed by these acts. A labor union holds a strike at a munitions factory. A newspaper runs an advertisement supporting the war effort. A person says that the government made a mistake by getting involved in the war. A speaker suggests that people should stop work to protest the war. A flyer encourages young men to enlist in the army.
History
2 answers:
Kruka [31]3 years ago
6 0

(A) A labor union holds a strike at a munitions factory.

(c)A person says that the government made a mistake by getting involved in the war.

(d) A speaker suggests that people should stop work to protest the war.

leva [86]3 years ago
4 0
The following statements would result in the application of the Espionage and Sedition Acts: 

1) A person says that the government made a mistake by getting involved in the war.

2) A speaker suggests that people should stop work to protest the war.

3) A labor union holds a strike at a munitions factory.

Both of these statements would result in punishments according to the Espionage and Sedition Acts (passed in 1918, during World War I). These acts made any speech that was considered critical of the government or disloyal to the US illegal. Along with this, anyone who interfered with the war effort could be punished. This is why the statements above would be real world situations of the Espionage and Sedition Acts.
You might be interested in
2. How did Germanic peoples organize Europe politically after the end of the western Roman empire? -into many kingdoms-
stepan [7]
<span><span>Answer: Into many kingdoms.
</span>The Germanic peoples settled in the zones of the old Roman Empire in the West, being born kingdoms where the Germans sought to separate like an elite, and separated of the population; but the Visigoths and Franks, more peaceful and stable, mingled with the population in religious, legislative and social aspects, coming to have Latin as the basis of their new languages. The difference between the Germanic peoples and the Roman Empire, in terms of their cultures, was very great, but from this contact, the Germans adopted many Roman customs, including their ways of organizing themselves politically; along with the old Germanic traditions. This mixture of cultures was the social and cultural basis of medieval Europe, and the basis of modern Western civilization.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What invention does John Green say has never really been improved upon?
Levart [38]

Answer:

Both the statements are correct about the concept of 'per capita income'. It means same even if it is calculated at the NDP, GNP and NNP levels. It is just an average and hardly says anythings about the real level incomes of the individuals.

7 0
3 years ago
List 3 facts about Anabaptist
uranmaximum [27]
Anabaptism is the name for several related branches of continental European lay Protestantism. These groups first began emerging after 1525 and were most prominent in (but not limited to) German and Dutch speaking territories. In German and Dutch the terms Wiedertaufer and wederdooper (rebaptizers) carry old, negative connotations 
3 0
3 years ago
How did World War II change life for many women and African-Americans
Oxana [17]
For women, it allowed women to join the work force.

For African Americans, it made jobs available because businesses were booming and a very small percentage of blacks fought in the war. 

Hope this helps!

-Payshence xoxo
3 0
3 years ago
What caused friction during the time of the Etruscans?
iogann1982 [59]

Answer:

the patricians resented the Etruscans for the way they treated the immigrants.

Explanation:

The Etruscans benefited the immigrants allowing them to join the army or giving them employment. That was the reason why immigrants were loyal to the Etruscan kings. They identified with them and they were safe. As a result, the patricians resented the Etruscans for the way they treated the newcomers and they were afraid that their privileges were threatened. This dissatisfaction caused friction between the Etruscans and the Roman elites and ended the monarchy.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • If you were Rome, who would you be more worried about receiving an attack from? The North or the South? Explain your answer.
    10·1 answer
  • In what ways did members of the women's auxiliary corps contribute to the war effort
    7·1 answer
  • Ideas spread to influence public opionion
    15·1 answer
  • To maintain good balance in a horizontal relationship you must
    12·1 answer
  • Why didn't the three Baltic states join the Commonwealth of Independent States?Why do you think that Estonia, Latvia, and Lithua
    11·1 answer
  • What was the effect of the court case Plessy vs. Ferguson?
    15·2 answers
  • Select all of the following which are possible reasons why Washington resigned as head
    9·1 answer
  • What made the civil war unavoidable?
    14·2 answers
  • What was a cause of the spread of the abolition movement?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the best reason many southerners feared the
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!