Group of answer choices.
a. Warning by the human resources department.
b. No consequences.
c. Loss of administrative credential.
d. An angry parent.
Answer:
a. Warning by the human resources department.
Explanation:
Human resources (HR) can be defined as an art of managing, controlling and improving the number of people (employees or workers), functions, activities which are being used effectively and efficiently by an organization.
Hence, human resources managers are saddled with the responsibility of managing and improving the welfare and working conditions of the employees working in an organization.
A possible consequence for failing to investigate a report of unprofessional conduct by a school employee would be to receive a warning by the human resources department.
If an employee working in an organization such as a school is found to act in an unprofessional manner towards a colleague, pupil or a parent, it is expected that the human resources department calls such a person to order through a query, warning in order to serve as a deterrent to others and to avoid a repeat of such behavior in the future.
Answer:Fedral court federal courts only hear: Cases in which the United States is a party; Cases involving violations of the U.S. Constitution or federal laws (under federal-question jurisdiction); Cases between citizens of different states if the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 (under diversity jurisdiction); and.
Explanation:
A public forum is something like streets parks and sidewalks which are; open to the public, it is protected under the first amendment, a private property is something that is owned by a private owner so basically anyone who isn’t the state or government
The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.
For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means
- There are two types of tortious interference
- Tortious interference with contract
- Tortious interference with good economic advantage.
- Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project
From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct
Learn more Tort interference from:
brainly.com/question/15058912
Answer:
if you are saved and you put God first you will go to heaven if I don't serve him then u go to hell
