Incomplete question. Attached is the missing image.
<u>Explanation:</u>
1. The shows a <u>weak</u> prisoner forced to make a statement against his will, he is been forced to say what the man (representing the dictator, Hitler) behind him tells him to say.
2. Many people conclude that the fact Hitler had absolute authority in Nazi Germany makes him personally responsible for the way in which German minorities were treated.
3. Because failing to do so as is often the case would result in their own death, just as the cartoon shows a gun pointed at the head of the prisoner.
4. So he appears to be their messiah or savior.
Answer:
The Parliament and the courts are separate: Parliament makes statute laws, the courts interpret the law. The judiciary (courts) can also "make" law through interpretations and application of common law.
Explanation:
Courts and parliaments interact in the law-making process. They need to work together so that the law is flexible and can apply to any situation that might arise.
The courts are responsible for settling disputes. Many disputes are settled by the courts by interpreting the words in an Act of parliament. As a secondary role, the courts also occasionally make laws.Parliament is the supreme law-making body. This is also referred to as sovereignty of parliament. Parliament’s main role is to make laws. As a supreme law-making body, parliament can make laws that either confirm or reject laws made by courts, although the Commonwealth Parliament cannot override High Court interpretations of the Commonwealth Constitution. Courts depend on parliament to make the bulk of the law. Parliament depends on courts to apply the law made by parliament and to establish new law on situations that have arisen for the first time.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Because you don't want for them to crash into you.
Answer:
<h3>a. give state courts automatic jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants.</h3>
Explanation:
- Long-arm statutes are laws that allow state courts to acquire automatic jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants. The courts can apprehend an out-of-state defendant based on certain actions which have connections with the concerned state.
- The provisions of a long-arm statute normally grants a state court the right to jurisdiction over a non-state domicile if the individual has minimum connection within the state's court jurisdiction.