Answer:
It is B I guess.
Explanation:
I apologize if it's wrong. But I think it is B.
One of the chief concerns for those that set sail on the Mayflower was how to organize themselves, especially with a variety of factions, once they got to the new world.
This wasn't a problem in England as you did what the King and his government wanted you to do.
The Mayflower Compact was ingenious, then, as it allowed for a structure where people knew the rules of the game and allowed for decisions to be made.
The answer is "Sarah demonstrates dissociative fugue".<span>
</span><span>Dissociative fugue is at least one scenes of amnesia in which an individual can't review a few or the greater part of his or her past. Either the loss of one's personality or the development of another character may happen with sudden, startling, deliberate travel far from home.
</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.