1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zmey [24]
3 years ago
13

What did charles i's fate demonstrate? no english monarch could ignore parliament. parliament was weaker than the monarchy. ther

e was no place for kings and queens in england. kings and queens remained above?
History
2 answers:
vodomira [7]3 years ago
8 0

<u>No English monarch could ignore Parliament.</u>

Charles I's relationship with Parliament was always difficult since the beginning of his government (1625). It was full of disputes and disagreements. In 1628, A Petition of Right sent by the Parliament was approved by the king, however, he soon completely ignored the contract and contributed to the rising tensions. The following year, the king ended up dissolving the Parliament and ruled without it for 11 years.

Nevertheless, the king recurred to them again in 1641 since he needed to obtain funds to fight a war against Scotland. When they met again, the tensions rose again and the king refused the Parliament's conditions. No agreement was made.

All of this and the increasing discussions led to two civil wars in England, in which the parliament had allianced with the Scots. The King was defeated in 1646 and put on trial for treason. He was executed on 30 January 1649. Charles I' reign demonstrate the importance of not commanding a reign alone.

natali 33 [55]3 years ago
7 0
No English monarch could ignore Parliament is the correct answer on edgenuity, just took the test.
You might be interested in
In "Homesick," why does Jean's mother tell her to "do as the Romans do"
Eva8 [605]
She told her to (D she want jean to fit in and not to cause trouble
5 0
3 years ago
Is free trade a natural right why?[
Helen [10]

Free trade is not a natural right. It is proven by a counter example: China is a planned economy and does not have free trade. So it is not a natural right.


6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 6 <br><br> No role play part
s2008m [1.1K]

Answer:

westerners were usually upset and did not approve of the other socites the offer lotted and dipped

7 0
3 years ago
Abraham lincoln declared what national holiday in 1863?
Reika [66]

That'd be Thanksgiving.

8 0
3 years ago
The churches of hagia sophia and san vitale and the monastery of saint catherine demonstrate how justinian uses religious monume
yanalaym [24]
Just need to answer questions

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What british admiral defeated the french navy on two occasions
    13·1 answer
  • I’m the early and mid 1800s how did the economics of the northern and southern states compare
    15·2 answers
  • Sunni Muslims believe that, after the death of the Prophet Mohammed, the new leader of the Muslim nation should be A. a descenda
    14·2 answers
  • What needed to be developed so early societies could keep records of extensive trade?
    5·1 answer
  • History Question (75 points :3)
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the cities on the map is farthest from the Vikings' homeland?​
    12·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIST
    13·2 answers
  • 1) Which is an example of eugenics? A. Forced sterilization B. Public bathrooms C.Institutionalization D. Deinstitutionalization
    11·2 answers
  • Anti-trust laws _____________.
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME!! I NEED THIS NOW U DONT HAVE TO DO ALL OF IT BUT HELP ME GET STARTED PLEASE THANK YOU
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!