1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zmey [24]
3 years ago
13

What did charles i's fate demonstrate? no english monarch could ignore parliament. parliament was weaker than the monarchy. ther

e was no place for kings and queens in england. kings and queens remained above?
History
2 answers:
vodomira [7]3 years ago
8 0

<u>No English monarch could ignore Parliament.</u>

Charles I's relationship with Parliament was always difficult since the beginning of his government (1625). It was full of disputes and disagreements. In 1628, A Petition of Right sent by the Parliament was approved by the king, however, he soon completely ignored the contract and contributed to the rising tensions. The following year, the king ended up dissolving the Parliament and ruled without it for 11 years.

Nevertheless, the king recurred to them again in 1641 since he needed to obtain funds to fight a war against Scotland. When they met again, the tensions rose again and the king refused the Parliament's conditions. No agreement was made.

All of this and the increasing discussions led to two civil wars in England, in which the parliament had allianced with the Scots. The King was defeated in 1646 and put on trial for treason. He was executed on 30 January 1649. Charles I' reign demonstrate the importance of not commanding a reign alone.

natali 33 [55]3 years ago
7 0
No English monarch could ignore Parliament is the correct answer on edgenuity, just took the test.
You might be interested in
When African slaves were brought to the European colonies in North America, members of multiple African cultures came into conta
lions [1.4K]

Cultural mixing is the coming together of two or more cultures leading to  its coexistence at the space and time.

According to the passage, the major factor that brought about several African cultures coming together and co-mingling is the slave trade.

<h3>Creation of a distinct African American culture in North America</h3>

The creation of distinct African American culture in North Africa can be traced to the transatlantic slave trade. This was a period in history were Africans were captured as slaves and transported through the Atlantic ocean into North America.

   During the time of different African slaves living and working together, there were mixture of their different cultures. This may be in form of language, food or songs. Over the years, this cultural mixing led to the formation of an entirely new African American culture with traces on distinct original cultures.

<h3>Factors that Led To African American Culture</h3>
  • Slave Trade
  • Working on Plantations
  • Living together

During the period of African slaves living and working together, they spent a lot of time together learning and teaching their cultures among themselves. this can not be said about the slave masters because they spend limited time with the slave.

Learn more about African-Americans at brainly.com/question/14307974

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
4. The 22 Amendment limits a President to
astraxan [27]
It limited a President to two terms.
8 0
3 years ago
What kind of industrial advancement is noted in this image?
Korolek [52]

Answer:

The Assembly Line

Explanation:

The assembly line is where a line of workers all have the same job, and that job and extremely simple.  

This was useful for the economy, as it reduced unemployment overall and increased money circulation.  

4 0
3 years ago
Karl Marx called religion the "opiate of the masses.” This statement reflects his belief that religion was: useful in a producti
den301095 [7]

Karl Marx called religion the "opiate of the masses.” This statement reflects his belief that religion was useful in a productive society. This is further explained below.

<h3>What is the "opiate of the masses.”?</h3>

Generally, is simply defined as According to Karl Marx, in the middle of the nineteenth century, religion is "the opium of the masses," detaching poor people from the present moment and dulling their interest in progressive politics.

In conclusion, Karl Marx referred to religion as "the opium of the people." His view on the value of religion in a civilized society is shown in this remark.

Read more about Karl Marx

brainly.com/question/13742699

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
I'm struggling with my history someone please help me for a bit!
vladimir2022 [97]
I believe it’s because they were handmade
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • On the eve of the American invasion of the Japanese-held island of Iwo Jima, how was the mood of the Japanese defenders of the i
    6·1 answer
  • Why do many scientists believe that humans have contributed to climate change?
    14·2 answers
  • How did Japan transform itself after the arrival of US Commodore Perry in 1853?
    10·2 answers
  • 5 what is unique about the house in which emily dickinson was born
    8·2 answers
  • In which sentence are the brackets used INCORRECTLY?
    5·1 answer
  • The Star Spangled Banner was written during the defense of this place during the War of 1812.
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following political philosophers put forth the belief that “people can replace a ruler who fails to do his duties”?
    10·1 answer
  • What led to the decline of ghana
    13·2 answers
  • What rights did the guarantee for Americans?
    8·2 answers
  • Write an essay that answers the research question you developed. You should have a minimum of three sources. Follow each step of
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!