1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Viefleur [7K]
2 years ago
7

If the demand for computers increases because it increases efficiency on the job in the financial market the demand curve will

History
1 answer:
kondor19780726 [428]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Hi,

The correct answer option is (D) shift to the right

Explanation

The demand curve will shift to the right if there is an increase demand of the computers. This is because more computers will be demanded by the users because they increase efficiency on performance of the job. Conversely, a decrease in demand will cause a shift to the left of the demand curve.

Best wishes!

You might be interested in
What is the back bone of history ?​
Paraphin [41]

Answer:

Health and Nutrition in the Western Hemisphere

3 0
1 year ago
Why do people support the Right to Bear Arms amendment?
EleoNora [17]

Answer:

Explanation:Modern debates about the Second Amendment have focused on whether it protects a private right of individuals to keep and bear arms, or a right that can be exercised only through militia organizations like the National Guard. This question, however, was not even raised until long after the Bill of Rights was adopted.

Many in the Founding generation believed that governments are prone to use soldiers to oppress the people. English history suggested that this risk could be controlled by permitting the government to raise armies (consisting of full-time paid troops) only when needed to fight foreign adversaries. For other purposes, such as responding to sudden invasions or other emergencies, the government could rely on a militia that consisted of ordinary civilians who supplied their own weapons and received some part-time, unpaid military training.

The onset of war does not always allow time to raise and train an army, and the Revolutionary War showed that militia forces could not be relied on for national defense. The Constitutional Convention therefore decided that the federal government should have almost unfettered authority to establish peacetime standing armies and to regulate the militia.

This massive shift of power from the states to the federal government generated one of the chief objections to the proposed Constitution. Anti-Federalists argued that the proposed Constitution would take from the states their principal means of defense against federal usurpation. The Federalists responded that fears of federal oppression were overblown, in part because the American people were armed and would be almost impossible to subdue through military force.

Implicit in the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists were two shared assumptions. First, that the proposed new Constitution gave the federal government almost total legal authority over the army and militia. Second, that the federal government should not have any authority at all to disarm the citizenry. They disagreed only about whether an armed populace could adequately deter federal oppression.

The Second Amendment conceded nothing to the Anti-Federalists’ desire to sharply curtail the military power of the federal government, which would have required substantial changes in the original Constitution. Yet the Amendment was easily accepted because of widespread agreement that the federal government should not have the power to infringe the right of the people to keep and bear arms, any more than it should have the power to abridge the freedom of speech or prohibit the free exercise of religion.

Much has changed since 1791. The traditional militia fell into desuetude, and state-based militia organizations were eventually incorporated into the federal military structure. The nation’s military establishment has become enormously more powerful than eighteenth century armies. We still hear political rhetoric about federal tyranny, but most Americans do not fear the nation’s armed forces and virtually no one thinks that an armed populace could defeat those forces in battle. Furthermore, eighteenth century civilians routinely kept at home the very same weapons they would need if called to serve in the militia, while modern soldiers are equipped with weapons that differ significantly from those generally thought appropriate for civilian uses. Civilians no longer expect to use their household weapons for militia duty, although they still keep and bear arms to defend against common criminals (as well as for hunting and other forms of recreation).

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What effect did the Tet offensive in Vietnam have on the war?
UNO [17]
They launched a coordinated attack against a number of targets in South Vietnam.<span> The attacks marked a </span>turning point<span> in the war. </span>
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the King of Siam react to European imperialism??
victus00 [196]
He educated himself and his people and negotiated to maintain independence
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When Mintz (with Freitag) examined the background of the 205 individuals who had been cabinet members from 1897 to 1973, she fou
gogolik [260]

Answer: a. there was a strong tendency to come from a business-elite background (76%)

Explanation:

Beth Mintz and Peter Freitag analyzed the backgrounds of every cabinet member serving between 1897 and 1973. Not only did they found that 66% of them could be considered as part of the upper class before getting their cabinet jobs, but also that more than 76% of them were connected with prominent corporations, and 90% of them came either from upper class or were linked with those corporations.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did charlie chaplin film the great director draw attention to
    12·1 answer
  • How did trade with Europeans affect the Native Americans during the colonial period
    13·2 answers
  • TRUE OR FALSE- PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY <br><br> Were Native Americans well treated on Mexican Ranchos?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of Brazil’s climate zones has a good chance of snow?
    12·1 answer
  • During the 1920’s, newspapers as a form of mass communication became popular. Using at least 5 of the terms below, summarize the
    5·1 answer
  • Identify 3 ways that sports influenced popular culture in the 1920s
    7·2 answers
  • Which phrase best completes the table?
    12·1 answer
  • *PLEASE RESPOND FASTTTTTT*
    12·1 answer
  • Hitler’s earliest involvement with the Nazi Party resulted in
    14·1 answer
  • Water is excreted from the kidneys, lungs, and ____________________ (liver, skin).
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!