A check will be written with the amount of $95. A sales discount, like 5%, 10days, simply means, you'll get 5% discount if paid within 10 days from the date of invoice.
If you pay within the discount period, say 6 days from the invoice date, instead of paying $100, you'll pay just $95 ($100 × 95%). Computed another way as, ($100 - ($100 × 5%)).
Answer:
= $22,500
Explanation:
The current value of the car: $25,000
at the end of the season: less by ten per cent.
Calculating 10 per cent of $ 25,000.00
= 10/100x25,000= $ 2500 0r 0.1 x $ 25,000.00
new price =$ 25,000 -$ 2500= 22500
= $22,500
Answer:
E. a promise to work for an employer for the rest of your life
Explanation:
The Statute of Frauds requires certain types of contracts to be in writing. All of these contracts must be in writing except a promise to work for an employer for the rest of your life.
Statutes of frauds cover:
Promises that involve marriage as consideration
Contracts that can't be performed within one year
Contracts that involve the sale or transfer of land
Contracts that involve promises by executors to pay estate debts
Contracts that involve a promise to act as a guarantor or surety
Contracts that involve the sale of goods worth more than $500
Hence a promise to work for an employer for the rest of your life
No , he is not correct
Explanation:
He's not right, because other factors, such as recession, economic crisis, large debts, etc, might be the source of the bad performance.
It means not that bad performance stops next year, so a lot of money can be wasted if the bad performance carries on.
Investors find some negative factors significant to mutual funds, like high cost ratios paid to the investor, undisclosed front and back-end costs, lack of control over investment decisions and skewed returns, that are perceived to be bad investments.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
This is a negative effect of energy subsidizes. Usually governments decide to subsidize energy consumption as a way of helping low income consumers and businesses. But at the end that doesn't happen and the results are quite the opposite. Most of the subsidies are taken by higher income families, e.g. big luxury homes use a lot of electricity. Subsidies end up reinforcing inequalities and the lower income families usually pay a higher percentage of the cost of having them.