1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Juli2301 [7.4K]
3 years ago
5

Which ruler conquered the persians around 330 b.c?

History
2 answers:
Rom4ik [11]3 years ago
6 0
The answer is Alexander the Great
lutik1710 [3]3 years ago
3 0
Alexander the Great
You might be interested in
Technological advances in the arms and artillery in the era of the Civil War resulted in________.
tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

Technological advances in the arms and artillery in the era of the Civil War resulted in high numbers of casualties on both sides.  That´s why many battles of the war were military stalemates but supposed horrendous carnage.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Describe the experiences African Americans experienced in the military during the World War 2
kipiarov [429]

Answer:

Explanation:

The kind of treatment they received by white officers in army bases in the United States was horrendous. They described being in slave-like conditions and being treated like animals. They were called racial epithets quite regularly and just not afforded respect either as soldiers or human beings

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone help me with 5 questions on a 6th grade history test?
d1i1m1o1n [39]
Use my ng connect book for resource
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best states an interpretation of the Second Amendment?
deff fn [24]

Answer:

There should be no limits on owning and using guns.

Explanation:

The Second Amendment was added to the constitution to protect people's right to keep and bear arms and the government's right to establish a Militia for the defense of the nation. Therefore, "There should be no limits on owning and using guns" is the statement that best interprets the statute because the statute is not specific enough, it can be broadly understood that since people have the right to own arms for self-defense, they also have the right to use them when there is a threat to their security.

The amendment states: <em>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, </em><em>the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.</em>

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do boston, massachusetts, san fransisco and california have in common?
vitfil [10]
They are both major US cities
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the rights of citizens change in the Philippines after Fredinand marcos was elected president
    13·1 answer
  • According to Patrick Henry, what have the colonist done to maintain good ties with the British?
    14·2 answers
  • Why was columbus' contact with America significant? Please help! Simple answer please!
    12·1 answer
  • What name is given to the dust left on a surface after it has been scraped off with a mineral? ​
    10·1 answer
  • How does wallaces description of American foreign policy compare to trumans and nivikovs
    13·1 answer
  • What is the similarities of Sparta and Athen structure?
    6·2 answers
  • What are the last two territories to become US states ​
    13·1 answer
  • The eight clergymen represent spiritual leaders from
    10·1 answer
  • Was Ghandi a barrister or solicitor during each the two periods when he practiced law in South Africa?
    14·2 answers
  • Who should be allowed to vote in general
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!