Because, their discussion should be exact
<span>Show the ambiguity and inherent questions in human beings and their morality. Because the works are so ambiguous, they make the reader question their own morality, as well as the nature of morality in general. He played off the idea of people's base desires and of doing the right thing.</span>
Answer and Explanation:
Although you did not present the text to which this question refers, we can infer that the author presents many different jargon, because he wants to refer to many different activities, allowing not only different people to recognize these words, but showing how rich and colloquial language is. diversified. With this, the author shows that the language is alive and easily adaptable to the community to which it is integrated.
Hello. You did not submit the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, I will try to help you as best I can.
The only way to answer this question is by reading the text it is related to. During this reading, there are two ways in which you can see how effective Powell's appeal is in relation to a two-party approach to political issues. The first way is to analyze the evidence that Powell used to justify his position. In that case, you must assess how far this evidence is consistent with reality and is capable of proving that Powell's opinion is relevant. The second way is to assess how much Powell's opinion is relevant to you and how much you agree with him. If you choose the second option, you will need to use your own evidence to justify your opinion.
