Answer:
I believe the answer is C.
The evidence Levitt and Dubner present in response to the counterclaim is that 7-7 wresters' results drop (first option).
<h3>What is a counterclaim?</h3>
This is a statement that disproves the main claim or thesis. Moreover, this can be answered by providing evidence that disproves the counterclaim.
<h3>What evidence do Levitt and Dubner present?</h3>
The counterclaim is that a 7-7 is more likely to win, this can be disproved through the detail that these wrestlers' results drop because this shows they are not more likely to win than others.
Note: This question is incomplete because the options are missing; here are the options:
In the next match, 7-7 wrestlers' results drop below their predicted percentage.
The 7-7 wrestlers do well against both 8-6 and 9-5 opponents.
Wrestling matches only last a few seconds and are won by a quick exertion of force.
Wrestlers from the same stable do not oppose one another.
Learn more about counterclaim in: brainly.com/question/1757292
#SPJ1
I belie the answer is number 1. Dangling modifiers are used to clarify something stated in a sentence. It is a phrase or word used to clearly modify a word.
Heavy, thin, huge, very strong, these are your answers
If by the third party system you refer to the party system now in place in the United States of America, the Democratic Party would qualify as the 'liberal party' that intends to use the power and influence of the federal government to carry out its political agenda while the GOP or Republican Party would qualify as the 'conservative party' whose aim is to curtail 'big government' while also catering more to big businesses and generally conservative causes such as religion, gun rights etcetera.
Usually the third party in the USA, either the Green Party or the Libertarian Party, would both qualify as 'liberal' parties compared to the GOP or Republican party
