What is $3.00 times 40

According to a Pew Research Center study, in May 2011, 35% of all American adults had a smart phone (one which the user can use

taurus [48]

Answer:

$z=\frac{0.4 -0.35}{\sqrt{\frac{0.35(1-0.35)}{300}}}=1.82$

$p_v =P(z>1.82)=0.034$

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.1$ we have $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis

And the best conclusion would be:

There is enough evidence to show that more than 35% of community college students own a smart phone (Pvalue = 0.034).

And for the second case the correct system of hypothesis is:

H0: p = 0.078; Ha: p > 0.078

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

n=300 represent the random sample taken

$\hat p=\frac{120}{300}=0.4$ estimated proportion of college students that have a smart phone

$p_o=0.35$ is the value that we want to test

$\alpha=0.1$ represent the significance level

Confidence=90% or 0.90

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value (variable of interest)

Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the proportion is >0.35.:

Null hypothesis: $p\leq 0.35$

Alternative hypothesis: $p > 0.35$

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion $\hat p$ is significantly different from a hypothesized value $p_o$ .

Calculate the statistic

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:

$z=\frac{0.4 -0.35}{\sqrt{\frac{0.35(1-0.35)}{300}}}=1.82$

Statistical decision

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level provided $\alpha=0.1$ . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(z>1.82)=0.034$

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.1$ we have $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis

And the best conclusion would be:

There is enough evidence to show that more than 35% of community college students own a smart phone (Pvalue = 0.034).

And for the second case the correct system of hypothesis is:

H0: p = 0.078; Ha: p > 0.078

4 0

3 years ago

What is 3+0.75x=5.25-0.25 equal?

s2008m [1.1K]

3 + 0.75x = 5.25 - 0.25x

0.75x = 2.25 - 0.25x

x = 2.25

3 + 0.75(2.25) = 5.25 - 0.25(2.25)

3 + 1.6875 = 5.25 - 0.5625

4.6875 = 4.6875

They are equal

6 0

2 years ago

Rewrite the statement in mathematical notation. (Let y be the distance from the top of the ladder to the floor, x be the distanc

In-s [12.5K]

Answer:

$\frac{dy}{dt}=\frac{6y}{x}\text{ ft per sec}$

Step-by-step explanation:

Let L be the length of the ladder,

Given,

x = the distance from the base of the ladder to the wall, and t be time.

y = distance from the base of the ladder to the wall,

So, by the Pythagoras theorem,

$L^2 = y^2 + x^2$

$\implies L = \sqrt{y^2 + x^2}$ ,

Differentiating with respect to time (t),

$\frac{dL}{dt}=\frac{d}{dt}(\sqrt{x^2 + y^2})$

$=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{x^2 + y^2}}\frac{d}{dt}(x^2 + y^2)$

$=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{x^2 + y^2}}(2x\frac{dx}{dt}+2y\frac{dy}{dt})$

$=\frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2 +y^2}}(x\frac{dx}{dt}+y\frac{dy}{dt})$

Here,

$\frac{dy}{dt}=-6\text{ ft per sec}$

Also, $\frac{dL}{dt} = 0$ ( Ladder length = constant ),

$\implies \frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2 +y^2}}(x(-6)+y\frac{dy}{dt})=0$

$-6x + y\frac{dy}{dt}=0$

$y\frac{dy}{dt}=6x$

$\implies \frac{dy}{dt}=\frac{6y}{x}\text{ ft per sec}$

Which is the required notation.

8 0

3 years ago

Solve -5(8 – 0.5x) = -2(3 – 0.4x) HELP ASAP

svetlana [45]

Answer:

20

Step-by-step explanation:

if you want a explanation ask for it :)

6 0

3 years ago

I need helppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp

fiasKO [112]

Please give brainliest
1 equals 3 over 4
2 equals 1 over 6
3 equals 1 over 5
4 equals 1 over 3
5 equals 5 over 11
6 equals 1 over 4
7 equals 1 over 5
8 equals 1 over 9
9 equals 2 over 5
10 equals 1 over 3

3 0

2 years ago