Answer:
Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark 1896 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. The case stemmed from an 1892 incident in which African American train passenger Homer Plessy refused to sit in a car for blacks. Rejecting Plessy’s argument that his constitutional rights were violated, the Supreme Court ruled that a law that “implies merely a legal distinction” between whites and blacks was not unconstitutional. As a result, restrictive Jim Crow legislation and separate public accommodations based on race became commonplace.
Answer:
C. Pastoralism
Explanation:
The Olmec culture flourished along the Gulf Coast of Mexico from around 1200-400 B.C. The Olmecs exercised basic agricultural practices using the slash and burn method in which the whole vegetation is burned and brushing the soil, in order to allow the ash to rest which acts as fertilizers. They opted to setlle near water, because the floodplains were good for agriculture, and it was easier to have fish and shellfish. However, hunting was a major source of food. Deers and domesticated dogs served the requirement of meat.
<span> Parsons uses words that describe the workers position in the labor force and how they feel about how they are treated and what they want instead of lots of work.</span>
<span>They make the workers sound lazy because it should be that they get more money when they do more work instead of doing less work for more money, it makes them sound greedy and like all they want is to get their paychecks handed to them. The words make them sound like the work conditions are horrible and they deserve better work conditions when they do less work.</span>
<span>I think he chose those words to be truthful and to demand more from the companies they work for. He’s going in front of the House of Representatives that they deserve different things.</span>
The French and the British had a conflict over the Ohio river valley because of the control over fur trading. The Britishers tried to take the business away from the French by offering the locals more goods against fewer furs. The French had originally taken control over the Ohio river valley before the Britishers tried to get entry into the valley. The French did not take this heavy handedness of the Britishers lightly and so they started creating a line of forts. These forts were built to protect the fur traders from the invading Britishers. Many British settlers also started ariving in the Ohio river valley and this was not taken gladly by the French.
I’d say Republican/Conservative! Good luck :)
