Answer:
Mr. Black is correct. There is a basis established by their current capital balances. Mr. White's ratio of 2 : 1 has not discernible basis, unless that has been their profit sharing ratio.
Explanation:
In the absence of any contrary agreement, partners in a partnership business always share their net income based on their capital contributions. Sometimes, this may not be strictly followed, especially with changes effected over the years, it becomes necessary to adopt home-grown solutions. One of such is the current capital balances, instead of the original capital contributions. This approach takes care of changes and value contributions over a number of years that the business has been in operation, which the current capital accounts will always show.
Answer: He should go with the ethically correct option which is not to mix the older produce with the newer one.
Explanation:
In ethical dilemmas especially ones involving business it is best to go for the ethically right option. Unethical decisions can give short term results but they are almost always caught out in the future meaning that the business faces ruin in the future. Using the cases of Enron and Worldcom as examples where the companies engaged in unethical accounting conduct that guaranteed short term success, their fall from grace showed that unethical decisions are not sustainable.
With this in mind he should not mix the produce for his business to survive because there is a high chance he will reject it in future.
Answer:
number 1
The buffer The Rationale, A good will attempt, and the bad news.
Number 2= Second
Number 3= False
Number 4= Who is the message intended for and How severe is the message
Number 5= Be as vague as possible
Number 6= True
Number 7= The Beds have been discounted and recalled but there will be no returns accepted or replacements OFFERED
Number 8= True
Number 9= False
Number 10= False
Number 11=True
Explanation:
Based on legalities, Thomas has the right to refuse payment of the 8% commission to RE/MAX because he already stated his refusal during the meeting with Darragh nor did he sign the document that Darragh gave him during the meeting. Thus, there was no meeting of minds.
Darragh is entitled to be given a reimbursement for his expenses incurred in securing documents that he willingly gave to Thomas. He can also ask Thomas for a recompensation for his labors but it will be according to Thomas's discretion.
Darragh can't claim that he worked on implied consent from Thomas because Thomas specifically stated his refusal in paying for the 8% commission during their meeting but Darragh did not stop to renegotiate the commission nor convince Thomas to accept the contract.
Answer:
A group bonus system
Explanation:
In relationship-oriented cultures, group bonuses are very common, and they are not like the regular yearly bonuses given out at Christmas, specially in Japan. In Japan, there are two bonuses per year, one paid during mid-year and the other one at the end of the year. These bonuses can amount to 3-6 months worth of salary, but they are also paid to the whole group of workers. That means that either everyone in the team gets a bonus or no one does.
Relationship-oriented cultures are based upon the well being, motivation and satisfaction of the whole team.