I think policymakers would link social security payments to inflation to help the recipients with the increased cost of living due to inflation of prices also. I don't think small increases due to a low rate of inflation is a downside because the low rate of inflation means goods and services will not increase much in price so will still be relatively affordable.
To record final annual interest and bond repayment:
2017
Mar 1
Bonds interest expense $25,400
Bonds payable $254,000
Cash $279,000
On March 1, 1997, the date of issuance, the entry is:
1997
Mar 1
Cash $254,000
Bonds payable $254,000
On each March 1 for 10 years, beginning March 1, 1997 (ending March 1, 2017), the entry would be (Remember, calculate interest as Principal x Interest Rate x Time)
Mar 1
Bond Interest Expense ($100,000 x 12% x 1) $25,400
Cash $25,400
Answer:
A message in which you are trying to get the reader to agree with your opinion. This way the walk away with a new perspective over such topic.
Answer:
The beta is 1
Explanation:
The computation of beta using the CAPM model is shown below:
As we know that
Expected rate of return = Risk free rate of return + Beta × Market risk premium
9.5% = 5% + Beta × 9.0%
9.5% - 5% = Beta × 9.0%
9.0% = Beta × 9.0%
So, the beta is 1
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
Answer:
3.18%
Explanation:
Calculation for the annual increase in the price of the average house sold
We are suppose to use this formula FV = PV (1+r)^t but since we are looking for R the formula to use will be:
R = (FV / PV)^1/16– 1
Let note that 2016-2000 will give us 16 years
Where,
FV=$354,900
PV=$215,100
Let plug in the formula
R= ( $354,900/$215,100 )^1/8)16– 1
R=(1.6499)^1/16-1
R=1.0318-1
R=0.0318×100
R=3.18%
Therefore the annual increase in the price of the average house sold will be 3.18%