All categories

3 years ago

Justices practice judicial restraint when they

Law

2 answers:

Degger [83]3 years ago

6 0

Make rulings that change the laws passed by congress.

dimulka [17.4K]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Justices practice judicial restraint when they make narrow decisions that only relate to a specific case.

Explanation:

Judicial restraint is a principle of separation of powers that must be taken into account in judicial decision-making.

According to this principle, the case law should not answer or anticipate questions that fall within the original area of legislative or executive power (legal activism). These should not be answered and made binding by the highest courts, but rather by the constitutionally provided and legitimized bodies such as Congress or the federal government.

You might be interested in

Which of the following is NOT a responsibility of the Judicial Branch?

Vesna [10]

Answer:I believe it’s either amend the US Constitution or Resolve disputed between the states

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

On May 15, 2021 a high court in Accra dealt with three different cases: Case 1: Petra construction company Ltd took the ministry

Verdich [7]

Answer:

Case 1 (Fordjour v. Ahmed case on rent) and Case 3 (Giz Construction v. Ministry of Roads on Nonpayment of project ) are civil cases which entail one party by talking the other party to court over money. Ahmed was taken to court by his landlord Fordjour over rent arrears while Minirtsy of Roads was taken to court for non-payment of project by Giz Construction. Case 2 (GRA v. Melcom over Tax payment) is criminal case as it entails Melcom violating laws stipulated by the government.

3 0

3 years ago

What are the criteria to get a gun?

vazorg [7]

Answer:

depends on the state

Explanation:

google your state go through the legal proccess

7 0

4 years ago

1. The Bill of Rights

Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

. The Bill of Rights

the rights of every citizen.

2. Freedom of

allows people to gather and share their

opinions.

3. In order for accused people to receive fair treatment, the Fifth Amendment

has a

clause.

4. The Fifth Amendment protects people from

so that they

cannot be tried twice for the same crime.

5. People are allowed to

the government

and ask for changes.

6. People who are born or

in the United States can vote.

7. The Nineteenth Amendment is for woman

8. A President can only be elected to two

8 0

2 years ago

Why do you think companies engage in corporate crime? Do you think that society should be doing more about corporate crime? Why

I am Lyosha [343]

I do think that society should be doing more about corporate crime because these companies are taking large sums of money from people and other businesses, and potentially the government. ... Also, police could use the time saved to focus on more violent and pressing crimes.

7 0

3 years ago