Answer:
False
The diamond-water paradox is illustrated by stating that the marginal benefit of the services provided by doctors and nurses is relatively lower than the marginal benefit of the services provided by major film stars. This implies that the supply of doctors and nurses is larger than the demand while the demand for major film stars is larger than the supply.
Explanation:
The marginal utility derived by film consumers from major film stars is higher than the marginal utility derived by patients from doctors and nurses. This is because consumers of the services of major film stars are willing to pay more for the services than consumers of the services of doctors and nurses. Though health is more crucial to life than films, but consumers place more utility value on films than they do on their health, especially after attaining the basic sound health. This actually explains the diamond water paradox, where consumers value diamond and are willing to pay more for diamond than they are willing to pay for life-sustaining water. In a layman's language, people are more willing to value the satisfaction they derive from one more additional film than they are to value the satisfaction they derive from additional healthcare. That means that people only care for the basic in healthcare. But, they can stake more to acquire more diamond.
If the market for a good that sees its production costs and prices rise is inelastic, the quantity demanded will not change.
<h3>What is inelastic demand?</h3>
A good that has inelastic demand is one that will not see its demand change much when there is a price change.
This means that demand remains more or less the same even if prices rise. Examples of such goods are water and food. The product above will therefore not see its demand change by much.
Find out more on inelastic demand at brainly.com/question/24384825.
Answer:
kailangan meron ka companies
Explanation:
advance mag isip wag dto
