1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
diamong [38]
3 years ago
12

If it is assumed that people vote for the candidate who comes closer to matching their own views, to win votes in a two-person r

ace
A. one candidate will move to the far right of the political spectrum while the other moves to the far left.
B. one candidate will move between the middle and far right end of the political spectrum while the other moves between the middle and the far left end.
C. both candidates will move to the far right end of the political spectrum.
D. both candidates will move to the far left end of the political spectrum.
e. both candidates will move toward the middle of the political spectrum.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Solnce55 [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

e. both candidates will move toward the middle of the political spectrum.

Explanation:

The median voter theorem is a political theory by which the decisions of citizens when voting are divided into two groups which we will call as has traditionally been done: the political right and left.

The citizens of the left will vote to the left and vice versa but there will be a group of voters who have not decided their vote or who have preferences on the part of each of the two ideologies and who, depending on the moment, will vote for one or the other.

You might be interested in
What’s the answer????
Nesterboy [21]

Answer:

I do not know the second one however the first one would be all of them

Explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A customer ordered fried chicken strips at the drive-in window of Famous Burger. One of the "strips" turned out to be an entire
Alex

Answer:

forbearance

Explanation:

A customer ordered fried chicken strips at the drive-in window of Famous Burger. One of the "strips" turned out to be an entire chicken head, battered and deep fried. Famous Burger tested the head and found that it was, indeed, cooked in their batter and in their oil. Pictures of the customer with the fried head showed up in newspapers and on the Internet. Famous Burger offered the customer a cash settlement in exchange for promises to not divulge the amount of the settlement, sue Famous Burger over the incident, or ever speak of it in public again. Agreeing NOT to exercise these three rights in exchange for the settlement is an example of <u>forbearance</u>.

Forbearance in law refers to the act of refraining to seek legal actions, to sue or enforce a right. This is usually accepted after out of court settlement between the parties involved.

4 0
3 years ago
How can citizens change laws at the local level?
inna [77]
Citizens can have an initiative which can put your law on the ballot to be voted on which in the end with enough signatures or votes your law may become true and realized as a real law. 
4 0
4 years ago
Global trade is the exchange of sods and services between countries.
zalisa [80]

Answer:

International trade is the exchange of goods and services between countries. Trading globally gives consumers and countries the opportunity to be exposed to goods and services not available in their own countries, or which would be more expensive domestically.

Explanation:

sana maka help

5 0
3 years ago
william rusch, trans. the trinitarian controversy. sources of early christian thought. fortress press, 1980.
Nadusha1986 [10]

This volume examines how the Arian conflict affected the patristic church's evolution of the Trinity belief.

<h3 /><h3>What do you understand by  Trinitarian controversy?</h3>

The time period under discussion, commonly referred to as the trinitarian controversy, spans from approximately A.D. 319, when Arius began to preach, to approximately A.D. 419, when Augustine completed his work On the Trinity, though the Council of Constantinople in A.D. 381 established the main principles of this dispute's resolution. The belief is that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are three separate and distinct divine beings rather than three individuals of a single essence and independent of one another. Mainstream Christianity is founded on the Trinity idea. But insofar as it asserts that "one God" is made up of "three individuals" (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit), it seems to be just as illogical as saying that 1+1+1=1.

To know more about the controversy, visit:

brainly.com/question/14837486

#SPJ4

8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Barbara remarks, "the closer we get to the restaurant, the hungrier i get!" this observation corresponds to which concept?
    15·1 answer
  • The number of electoral votes a state gets depends on what?
    14·1 answer
  • During lecture each day, a psychology professor may explain four main points he or she wishes the class to retain. However, most
    7·2 answers
  • Our electoral and institutional rules are set up for a _____. A. direct democracy B. single party dominance C. two-party system
    14·1 answer
  • what is worse. Having a snotty tissue thrown on you or having tiny blood spots (from a lip) on a tissue thrown on you?
    14·1 answer
  • What do you understand by the term resources????​
    9·1 answer
  • What are the three steps of intrusive igneous rock formation?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the antonym of the world “professional” w.r.t it’s usage in the passage? a) Competent b) Amateur c) Master d) Polished
    8·1 answer
  • In narrative psychology, highly generative adults' scripts tend to feature a theme of?
    7·1 answer
  • chegg which general game theory structure was used in class to model bertrand non-cooperative oligopoly behavior?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!