420 is what I got. if you do two divided by 120 it gives you 60 then 60 times 7 is 420.
Alex is attempting to overcome Paralysis by Analysis.
<h3>What does "paralysis by analysis" mean?</h3>
According to Botnick, ruminating is the act of repeatedly spinning the same thoughts. But usually this overthinking doesn't produce any fresh insight. What ultimately causes the "paralysis," or inability to decide, is continuing to consider options when you already feel worn out and overwhelmed.
Overanalyzing or overthinking a situation can make forward motion or decision-making "paralyzed," which means that no solution or plan of action is agreed upon within a reasonable amount of time. Analysis paralysis describes an individual or group process where this might happen.
To know more about Paralysis by Analysis, refer:
brainly.com/question/14897425
#SPJ4
Answer:
B. Checks should be sequentially numbered and the numerical sequence should be accounted for by the person preparing bank reconciliations
Explanation:
Answer:
Year Dry Prepreg discounted cash flow
0 -$30,000 -$30,000
1 10,000 8,772
2 10,000 7,695
3 10,000 6,750
4 10,000 5,921
5 10,000 5,194
Year Solvent Prepreg. discounted cash flow
0 -$90,000 -$90,000
1 28,000 24,561
2 28,000 21,545
3 28,000 18,899
4 28,000 16,578
5 28,000 14,542
a. Calculate NPV, IRR, MIRR, payback, and discounted payback for each project
Dry Prepreg
NPV = $4,330
IRR = 19.86%
MIRR = 17.12%
payback = 3 years
discounted payback = 4.17 years
Solvent Prepreg
NPV = $6,130
IRR = 16.80%
MIRR = 15.51%
payback = 3.21 years
discounted payback = 4.58 years
b. Assuming the projects are independent, which one(s) would you recommend?
- both projects, since their NPV is positive
c. If the projects are mutually exclusive, which would you recommend?
Dry prepreg becuase its IRR, MIRR are higher, and its payback and discounted payback periods are shorter.
Answer:
Option C (The convenience.............downwards) is the correct choice.
Explanation:
- Throughout this circumstance, the convenient yield would maintain the very same, although the curve amount or rate will change downwards since it is a transient trading strategy, but perhaps the effects will be negative and then it will proceed to something like a downward shift throughout the convenience curve.
- The yielding of convenience might maintain the same because, but perhaps the curve degree may change downwards.
All other decisions are not linked to the circumstance issued. So, the alternative here is the right one.