Answer: They might be reading and trying to act out everything
Explanation: I do this a lot do it could be their acting out everything from the story.
Slope = rise/run = delta y/ delta x, so y (or rather, the difference in y values) is the numerator.
Answer:
1. It reflected the purpose of her speech as it provided clarity for her determination to protect her kingdom against European powers/invaders.
2. The main goal of the crusades by the Europeans was to install a Catholic ruler in England and this was resisted by Queen Elizabeth 1 who wanted England to be a Protestant or Anglican state.
Explanation:
Parallelism is the use of the same grammatical structure in a text. It provides contrast and balance in the text. It also helps to establish clarity in the intentions of the writer. Queen Elizabeth 1 made good use of parallelism by providing contrasts and comparing the things she could tolerate and the ones that could not be tolerated. Her speech is made up of contrasts used in the same lines to make her points stand out and to remove any doubts in the minds of her subjects.
For example, she said that she was there as a monarch 'not for her recreation or disport but for the heat of the battle, and if necessary to die for her subjects'. This would make her intentions stand out in the hearts of her subjects.
Primary Research: Primary research usually means a primary source. For example, Primary Research can be interviewing someone, conducting research. Other examples can be observations, case studies, surveys, experiments etc. The individual directly collects information from the experiment.
Secondary Research relies on secondary sources for example using a book to prepare for a report. Secondary data can be books, articles published, statistical data, reports, and case studies.
So basically, primary research is direct contact to collect the data and secondary is using other sources rather than directly getting the information from the source. Hope this helps.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
This statement is fluff because it says very little or nothing at all that is useful to the passage. It is clear from reading the names of the additives that they are chemicals, but it is even more unnecessary to say that they sound scary. This opinion does not add any substance to the piece and is distracting since at most it expresses the opinion of the author and at worse results in a disjointed description.
