Answer:
What will most likely happen in these lakes is that there will be a decline of several fish populations. The correct answer is A.
Explanation:
The options attached to the question are given below:
A. The decline of several fish populations
B. An increase in the number of fish.
C. An increase in the number of primary producers.
D. Increased predator- prey relationship.
The fishes, just like any other living organisms has ideal body temperature and pH at which they act best. The ideal pH for fish living in lake water is between 6 and 8. If the pH is reduced below this value then the water will become acidic and this will be toxic for the fish population living in the lakes. Therefore, those fish that can not cope will die and there will be a decrease in the fish populations.
Answer:
Rotifers are specialists at living in habitats where water dries up regularly.
The Monogononta, which have males, produce fertilised 'resting eggs' which can resist desiccation (drought) for long periods.[11]
The Bdelloids, who have no males, contract into an inert form and lose almost all body water, a process known as cryptobiosis. Bdelloids can also survive the dry state for long periods: the longest well-documented dormancy is nine years. After they have dried, they may be revived by adding water. In this, and several other ways, they are a unique group of animals.[12]
Explanation:
The front has a ring of cilia circling the mouth. This gave the rotifers their old name of "wheel animalules". There is a protective lorica round its body, and a foot. Inside the lorica are the usual organs in miniturised form: a brain, an eye-spot, jaws, stomach, kidneys, urinary bladder.
Rotifers have a number of unusual features. Biologists suppose that these peculiarities are adaptations to their small size and the transient (fast changing) nature of its habitats.
I believe it gives you the answer. It should be one fifth or 20%. #TeamAlvaxic
Answer:
well theory is ranked second highest in certainty in scientific nomenclature. theory dictates it is more certain of a principle than a hypothesis yet not concrete enough to be a law. examples are the theory of evolution versus the law of gravity
